Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Crumbling Campgate - What a shame
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="lrbguy, post: 3215528, member: 88829"]In 308 AD Imperial production of folles for the senior Augusti (Diocletian and Maximan) was suspended, as was the coinage for Severus, hence also the coinage for Constantine was arrested. This left the coinage for Galerius and Maximinus, to which was added the first coinage for Galeria Valeria. This reduction in output reduced the number of active officinae to four.</p><p><br /></p><p>It is at this time the first campgate reverses in bronze are introduced, on a large, albeit reduced, follis of 6 1/4 to 7 1/2 grams. Three officinae were devoted to Galerius, and his are the ones most familiar to collectors. </p><p><br /></p><p>Galerius// VIRTVS MILITVM</p><p>RIC VI Cyzicus 39</p><p>[ATTACH=full]835933[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>In this example the entrance through the gate has no door or other obstruction.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Next is a much nicer example of the gate reverse on a coin of Maximinus II. All these were produce from a single officina, and are not as frequently seen.</p><p><br /></p><p>Maximinus II // VIRTVS MILITVM</p><p>RIC VI Cyzicus 40</p><p>[ATTACH=full]835936[/ATTACH] </p><p>In this example the gate opening is partly obscured by a portcullis. This feature also appears on the same coin type for Galerius (but my example of that variety is so beatup I didn't want to show it).</p><p><br /></p><p>So these are the big brother precursors to the gates of reduced follis fame, which start with the Virtus gate reverses, but are overtaken by the Providentiae gate reverses.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="lrbguy, post: 3215528, member: 88829"]In 308 AD Imperial production of folles for the senior Augusti (Diocletian and Maximan) was suspended, as was the coinage for Severus, hence also the coinage for Constantine was arrested. This left the coinage for Galerius and Maximinus, to which was added the first coinage for Galeria Valeria. This reduction in output reduced the number of active officinae to four. It is at this time the first campgate reverses in bronze are introduced, on a large, albeit reduced, follis of 6 1/4 to 7 1/2 grams. Three officinae were devoted to Galerius, and his are the ones most familiar to collectors. Galerius// VIRTVS MILITVM RIC VI Cyzicus 39 [ATTACH=full]835933[/ATTACH] In this example the entrance through the gate has no door or other obstruction. Next is a much nicer example of the gate reverse on a coin of Maximinus II. All these were produce from a single officina, and are not as frequently seen. Maximinus II // VIRTVS MILITVM RIC VI Cyzicus 40 [ATTACH=full]835936[/ATTACH] In this example the gate opening is partly obscured by a portcullis. This feature also appears on the same coin type for Galerius (but my example of that variety is so beatup I didn't want to show it). So these are the big brother precursors to the gates of reduced follis fame, which start with the Virtus gate reverses, but are overtaken by the Providentiae gate reverses.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Crumbling Campgate - What a shame
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...