Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Crumbling Campgate - What a shame
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TIF, post: 3211565, member: 56859"]I bought a small group lot which contained many campgates, in part because I had no campgates and in part because love group lots <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />. The campgates had a lot of silvering. Speaking of, it seems that people speak of silvering in reverential tones... "and it still has some <i>silvering</i> [oooooh ahhhh]". After seeing my first "silvered" coins I think I prefer no trace of silver whatsoever, at least for these LRBs. Unless the silvering is absolutely perfect, it just makes the coin look splotchy.</p><p><br /></p><p>I've given many of them away but here's my favorite of that bunch:</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Constantine I, RIC VII Antioch 84, SMANTE</b></p><p><b><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/campgater11-constantinei-smante-jpg.436953/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p>Some time after that I bought another LRB which has no silvering whatsoever. While the coin itself may not be quite as nice in terms of the flan and preservation, I think the non-silvered surfaces are much more attractive. They're certainly easier to photography! The main attraction to this coin was the vintage Sear certificate, although as others pointed out there's no way to really know if the stapled flip contained the original coin. I have no reason to believe otherwise though.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/constantinei-campgate-vintagesearcert-ricvii-trier-449-border-jpg.606559/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>Constantine I follis, /campgate; RIC VII Trier 449</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/vintagesearcert-1978-constantinei-campgate-jpg.606560/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>...</p><p><br /></p><p>Since we're talking about campgates, I'm in the camp that believes the structures depicted on the reverse are signaling stations rather than camp/city gates.</p><p><br /></p><p>There's a good article about this in an old Celator (<a href="https://community.vcoins.com/the-celator-vol-18-no-1/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://community.vcoins.com/the-celator-vol-18-no-1/" rel="nofollow">Vol 18, No. 1, January 2004</a>), <i>Campgate Bronzes and Roman Fire Signalling, </i>Murray K. Dahm.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TIF, post: 3211565, member: 56859"]I bought a small group lot which contained many campgates, in part because I had no campgates and in part because love group lots :). The campgates had a lot of silvering. Speaking of, it seems that people speak of silvering in reverential tones... "and it still has some [I]silvering[/I] [oooooh ahhhh]". After seeing my first "silvered" coins I think I prefer no trace of silver whatsoever, at least for these LRBs. Unless the silvering is absolutely perfect, it just makes the coin look splotchy. I've given many of them away but here's my favorite of that bunch: [B]Constantine I, RIC VII Antioch 84, SMANTE [IMG]https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/campgater11-constantinei-smante-jpg.436953/[/IMG] [/B] Some time after that I bought another LRB which has no silvering whatsoever. While the coin itself may not be quite as nice in terms of the flan and preservation, I think the non-silvered surfaces are much more attractive. They're certainly easier to photography! The main attraction to this coin was the vintage Sear certificate, although as others pointed out there's no way to really know if the stapled flip contained the original coin. I have no reason to believe otherwise though. [IMG]https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/constantinei-campgate-vintagesearcert-ricvii-trier-449-border-jpg.606559/[/IMG] Constantine I follis, /campgate; RIC VII Trier 449 [IMG]https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/vintagesearcert-1978-constantinei-campgate-jpg.606560/[/IMG] ... Since we're talking about campgates, I'm in the camp that believes the structures depicted on the reverse are signaling stations rather than camp/city gates. There's a good article about this in an old Celator ([URL='https://community.vcoins.com/the-celator-vol-18-no-1/']Vol 18, No. 1, January 2004[/URL]), [I]Campgate Bronzes and Roman Fire Signalling, [/I]Murray K. Dahm.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Crumbling Campgate - What a shame
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...