Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Andrew McCabe, post: 3156288, member: 90666&quot;]no surprise to me. I would expect courts to defer to the executive on matters of defining what can be imported and on agreements with foreign countries. That&#039;s normal. The error was in pursuing a case that was going to lose. It would have been much better to pursue a case about coins that didn&#039;t contravene an MOU. For example somehow arrange to have some Roman denarii confiscated and then win them back as not being MOU covered in a court case. Or import MOU covered items that were shown to be out of source country before MOU was executed and do the same. That would have established a precedent that items not covered in an MOU can&#039;t be touched. Boundaries are thus set. Seems to me that if the executive has control of other import matters such as tariffs, it can decide to stop the import of defined items it&#039;s agreed about with another country. Not sure why the case was fought at all.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in