Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
couple of "barbs" slipped through
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Victor_Clark, post: 24640550, member: 10613"]Yes, some of these can look very childish; but my favorites are examples that can be hard to distinguish from official coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>This coin is an unrecorded combination of dies, commonly referred to as a mule. Obverse is likely Trier 540 and the reverse is a Constantinopolis Trier 543. It is most likely that this coin, though in very good style, is unofficial.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1567921[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Constantius II</p><p>Circa A.D. 332- 333</p><p>19mm 2.0g</p><p>FL IVL CONSTANTIVS NOB C; laureate and cuirassed bust right.</p><p>REV: Victory stg. on prow, holding long scepter in r. hand, and resting l. hand on shield.</p><p>in ex. TR•P</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This coin was a plate coin (#452MG) in Failmezger’s <b>Roman Bronze Coins: From Paganism to Christianity 294-364 A.D. </b>I’m sure that it is unofficial.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1567922[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Magnentius</p><p>Circa A.D. 350- 353</p><p>19mm 3.2g</p><p>DN MAGNENTIVS P F AVG; bare-headed, draped and cuirassed, A behind bust.</p><p>GLORIA ROMANORV; Magnentius on horseback spearing barbarian.</p><p>In ex. RPLG</p><p>Cf. RIC VIII Lyons 115</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This Constantine II is in good style, but bust left is not in RIC for this issue. The reverse style is very strange for Ticinum, especially the large turrets.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1567923[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Constantine II</p><p>A.D. 326</p><p>18x19mm 2.6gm</p><p>CONSTANTINVS IVN NOB C; Laureate, draped and cuirassed bust left.</p><p>PROVIDEN-TIAE CAESS; camp gate with two turrets and star between them.</p><p>In ex. T crescent T</p><p>Cf. RIC VII Ticinum 200</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Here's a Magnentius that is not bad, but has a few issues.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1567924[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Magnentius</p><p>A.D. 350-3</p><p>20x21mm 4.0gm</p><p>D N MAGNENTIVS P F AV[G]; bare-headed, draped & cuirassed bust right, A behind bust.</p><p>SALVS DD NN AVG ET CAES; large Chi-Rho flanked by N-W</p><p>In ex. TRP</p><p>Cf. RIC VIII Trier 320</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Here's a Constantine I that would pass a casual inspection</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1567925[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Constantine I</p><p>Circa A.D. 332-3</p><p>15x16mm 2.0g</p><p>CONSTAN-TINVS AVG; rosette-diadem, draped and cuirassed bust.</p><p>GLOR-IA EXERC-ITVS; Two soldiers helmeted, stg. facing one another, reversed spear in outer hands, inner hands on shields resting on the ground; between them two standards.</p><p>in ex. TR • P</p><p>RIC VII Trier ---</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This coin has been overstruck and the style looks good; but it would be remarkable if it was official, as mint overstrikes for this period are almost non-existent. The undertype is not really visible, but it might be an IOVI type issued 321- 324, but since London is further than these might have normally circulated and pretty far outside of the territory of Licinius, maybe an earlier issue like a Sol type.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1567926[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Crispus. Æ Follis (22mm, 3.44 g, 6h). Londinium (London) mint. Struck AD 324. Laureate head right / VOT/X in two lines within laurel wreath; PLON(crescent). Cf. RIC VII 291</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Sometimes unofficial coins from this period look very close in style to official coinage. Pierre Bastien in “Imitations of Late Roman Bronze Coins, 318-363.” ANSMN 30(1985) said this about imitations of the 318 reform and the Magnentian period..."the forgers sometimes engrave portraits of a quality close to that of the originals and some reverses cannot be distinguished from those of regular coins." So, sometimes you can never really be sure, but must rely on a “gut feeling”.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Victor_Clark, post: 24640550, member: 10613"]Yes, some of these can look very childish; but my favorites are examples that can be hard to distinguish from official coins. This coin is an unrecorded combination of dies, commonly referred to as a mule. Obverse is likely Trier 540 and the reverse is a Constantinopolis Trier 543. It is most likely that this coin, though in very good style, is unofficial. [ATTACH=full]1567921[/ATTACH] Constantius II Circa A.D. 332- 333 19mm 2.0g FL IVL CONSTANTIVS NOB C; laureate and cuirassed bust right. REV: Victory stg. on prow, holding long scepter in r. hand, and resting l. hand on shield. in ex. TR•P This coin was a plate coin (#452MG) in Failmezger’s [B]Roman Bronze Coins: From Paganism to Christianity 294-364 A.D. [/B]I’m sure that it is unofficial. [ATTACH=full]1567922[/ATTACH] Magnentius Circa A.D. 350- 353 19mm 3.2g DN MAGNENTIVS P F AVG; bare-headed, draped and cuirassed, A behind bust. GLORIA ROMANORV; Magnentius on horseback spearing barbarian. In ex. RPLG Cf. RIC VIII Lyons 115 This Constantine II is in good style, but bust left is not in RIC for this issue. The reverse style is very strange for Ticinum, especially the large turrets. [ATTACH=full]1567923[/ATTACH] Constantine II A.D. 326 18x19mm 2.6gm CONSTANTINVS IVN NOB C; Laureate, draped and cuirassed bust left. PROVIDEN-TIAE CAESS; camp gate with two turrets and star between them. In ex. T crescent T Cf. RIC VII Ticinum 200 Here's a Magnentius that is not bad, but has a few issues. [ATTACH=full]1567924[/ATTACH] Magnentius A.D. 350-3 20x21mm 4.0gm D N MAGNENTIVS P F AV[G]; bare-headed, draped & cuirassed bust right, A behind bust. SALVS DD NN AVG ET CAES; large Chi-Rho flanked by N-W In ex. TRP Cf. RIC VIII Trier 320 Here's a Constantine I that would pass a casual inspection [ATTACH=full]1567925[/ATTACH] Constantine I Circa A.D. 332-3 15x16mm 2.0g CONSTAN-TINVS AVG; rosette-diadem, draped and cuirassed bust. GLOR-IA EXERC-ITVS; Two soldiers helmeted, stg. facing one another, reversed spear in outer hands, inner hands on shields resting on the ground; between them two standards. in ex. TR • P RIC VII Trier --- This coin has been overstruck and the style looks good; but it would be remarkable if it was official, as mint overstrikes for this period are almost non-existent. The undertype is not really visible, but it might be an IOVI type issued 321- 324, but since London is further than these might have normally circulated and pretty far outside of the territory of Licinius, maybe an earlier issue like a Sol type. [ATTACH=full]1567926[/ATTACH] Crispus. Æ Follis (22mm, 3.44 g, 6h). Londinium (London) mint. Struck AD 324. Laureate head right / VOT/X in two lines within laurel wreath; PLON(crescent). Cf. RIC VII 291 Sometimes unofficial coins from this period look very close in style to official coinage. Pierre Bastien in “Imitations of Late Roman Bronze Coins, 318-363.” ANSMN 30(1985) said this about imitations of the 318 reform and the Magnentian period..."the forgers sometimes engrave portraits of a quality close to that of the originals and some reverses cannot be distinguished from those of regular coins." So, sometimes you can never really be sure, but must rely on a “gut feeling”.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
couple of "barbs" slipped through
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...