Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;ctrl, post: 1389387, member: 13378&quot;]Thanks for the images, I&#039;m looking at them, but they&#039;re pretty tough to make out. I&#039;ll keep looking more closely.</p><p><br /></p><p>1. In the legend, instead of PETRUS (for Pedro) it is an error as PETRUST (yours is correct)</p><p>2. For the Goiás counterstamps of this era, it&#039;s either going to be a 20/80 or 10/40 or 10/20 or 20/75. For 1829, it&#039;s limited to 10/20, 10/40, 20/80 (yours).</p><p>3. The only possiblity I&#039;m aware of for an 1828M is 10/37.5. The problem with what you&#039;ve posted is that for this issue, the M mintmark is not next to the date, but rather below the denomination in lower center of the coin. I can&#039;t make it out clearly what the date or mintmark is in the photos of this coin.</p><p>4. It does look like an M mintmark to me too. It looks more like 1821 to me than 1811. The possibilities for 1821M would be 37.5, possibly counterstamped with 10, or 75, possibly counterstamped with 20.&nbsp; I think I see a 7 to the left of the damage, meaning it would be a 75 with some kind of damage in the middle. I have no idea what that damage is or why, but I wouldn&#039;t say it was official.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in