countermark Heraclius

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by ro1974, Jan 13, 2019.

  1. ro1974

    ro1974 Well-Known Member

    Uncertain Sicilian mint. Struck circa 616/7-621/2. Crowned and draped facing bust of ; monogram to right; all within circular punch / SCLs within circular punch. DOC 241b; MIB Km. 4; Anastasi 32bis; SB 882. Host coin Fine, countermark VF. Struck on a follis of Justin I. 14.9 g

    36316_00165r00_c.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    It is good to see such a clear undertype on these.
     
    ro1974 likes this.
  4. Ed Snible

    Ed Snible Well-Known Member

    Wow, that's very charming!

    Any Byzantine bronze with a visible nose is a winner.

    Like Doug, the visible undertype makes it extra interesting.

    That reminds me, I have a Byzantine countermark myself, possibly Heraclius. But I know nothing about it. Not only is there no nose, I am not even sure where the emperor is. What do you think of this? byz-counter-both.jpg
    Mystery Byzantine, 4.2g, 17x26mm
     
  5. ro1974

    ro1974 Well-Known Member

    108319.jpg

    because i see / Large M, cross above; X/X, E/CON;
     
  6. ro1974

    ro1974 Well-Known Member


    HERACLIUS. 610-641 AD. Lot of two Æ Folles of Maurice Tiberius, with countermark attributed to Theodore, brother of Heraclius, circa 634-636 AD. Æ Follis (30mm, 10.82 gm, 7h). Constantinople mint. Dated RY 5 (586/7 AD). Helmeted facing bust / Large M, cross above; U, A/CON; countermark: monogram. Coin: DOC I 28a; MIB II 67D; SB 494 // Æ Follis (33mm, 12.54 gm, 7h). Constantinople mint. Dated RY 20 (601/2 AD). Helmeted facing bust / Large M, cross above; X/X, E/CON; countermark: monogram. Coin: DOC I 43 var (unlisted officina); MIB II 67D; SB 494. Countermarks: Lampinen, "Countermarked Byzantine Folles', in Caesarea Papers II, pp. 399-404, 2; DOC II 313; MIB III KM 1a; SB pg. 197. Average VF, the second with a scrape across the obverse. Two (2) coins in lot. The monogram used as a countermark can be identified as that of Theodore by comparison with identical monograms on Byzantine seals. Theodore, the brother of Heraclius, was put in command of the army confronting the first Muslim raiders invading Syria-Palestine. His army was thoroughly routed, and he was sent home in disgrace. The countermarks were probably applied to coins circ
     
    wegm10, Marsyas Mike and LaCointessa like this.
  7. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    Perhaps we need to address the question on when a large countermark becomes an overstrike. Does being two sided make the difference? Do I need both of these or are they just too similar? I have been wondering about that for a long time.
    rz0360bb0654.jpg rz0362fd2423.jpg
     
  8. David@PCC

    David@PCC allcoinage.com

    I'm still unsure of this one.
    mardin.jpg
    scan0036.jpg
     
    Marsyas Mike and ro1974 like this.
  9. Marsyas Mike

    Marsyas Mike Well-Known Member

    Nice to see
    This is very interesting. A while back I posted what I believe is this same (Palestine?) countermark. I had not encountered information about Theodore. My original post failed to capture much interest, so I'll tag back in.

    https://www.cointalk.com/threads/by...ria-palestine-a-heraclius-countermark.329326/

    My example:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Byzantine Empire Æ Follis
    Heraclius (c. 633-636 A.D.)
    Countermark on Maurice Tiberius (585-586 A.D.)
    Constantinople/Palestine Mint
    Host coin:
    [M]AVRIC TIB[ER PP AVG], helmeted & cuirassed bust facing / Large M, ANNO left, cross above, II / II right, Є below; CON in exergue.
    SB 494, MIB 65d-67d.
    (11.31 grams / 27 mm)
    Countermark: HRC cruciform monogram in 9 mm circle.
    Schulze HCM type 1b
     
    Theodosius, ro1974 and Johndakerftw like this.
  10. ro1974

    ro1974 Well-Known Member

    2019-0qq1-23 23.44.55.jpg 2019-ww-23 23.47.42.jpg my pictures thanks all :)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page