Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mark_h, post: 896037, member: 3726&quot;]From that one article:</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;A mechanical error is an obvious error. Examples: a clearly mint state frosty surface coin in a proof holder, a 1936 dated coin in a holder that said 1935, a Boone commem in a Texas commem holder, a flat as a pancake band dime in a FB holder, etc. The obvious mechanical error can sometimes be a grade. For example, in 1986 we had a dispute with a dealer because he purchased a MS65 1893-O dollar. The problem was the coin was a bag marked to death MS60 that no one in his right mind would ever consider even MS63 let alone MS65. The guiding concept with mechanical errors is common sense. David&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>Could it be a mechanical error on the MS-69 coin in the other thread?&nbsp; Let me add the link to paul&#039;s thread. Here it is - <a href="http://www.cointalk.com/t108897/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.cointalk.com/t108897/">link</a>.&nbsp; Could that be the problem?&nbsp; And does this mean that they would not provide remuneration for the person holding the coin?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in