Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;EagleEye, post: 530686, member: 16990&quot;]The 1871 Shallow N is a very scarce reverse type. Many may have never even see a real one in hand, so this fake will fool just about anyone! </p><p><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=250377275128" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=250377275128" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=250377275128</a></p><p><img src="http://i10.ebayimg.com/05/i/001/34/53/b5d4_1.JPG" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /><img src="http://i21.ebayimg.com/06/i/001/34/53/b62a_1.JPG" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>By itself no one would have any problem with this coins authenticity. But once you compare it with this known one, it become very worrisome. </p><p><a href="http://indiancent.wikispaces.com/1871+Counterfeit" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://indiancent.wikispaces.com/1871+Counterfeit" rel="nofollow">http://indiancent.wikispaces.com/1871+Counterfeit</a></p><p><img src="http://indiancent.wikispaces.com/file/view/1871_Shallow_N_Cft.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Although one has a die break over the OF and the other doesn&#039;t, they are from the same obverse. See the mark on the neck on both! I don&#039;t think the reverse dies are the same.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in