It was in my drawer at work. So what is the proof coin? It's more pricey than the s mint mark, right? It is awful shiny under almost 120 years of dirt.
Proof Lincoln cents in 1909 were matte proofs, and have a distinctive appearance. Yours is not a matte proof. It is a regular business strike.
Yes, a 1909 VDB matte proof would be worth even more than the 1909-S VDB business strike, despite the fact that the latter is the big key date for the Lincoln cent series, and worth a lot of money. But your coin is the much more common 1909 VDB business strike. (Philadelphia Mint, no "S" mintmark). Furthermore, it is lightly circulated, and though nice, it is not quite a Mint State coin. So in AU grade, it's likely worth less than 20 bucks. Which means it is not worth spending $40-50+ to get certified. The slab would end up costing more than the value of the coin itself. So nope- not a candidate for certification. That doesn't mean it's a bad coin, however. Enjoy it as-is. Nice find, nonetheless.
BTW, I took the liberty of using my moderator powers to crop and repost your images in the original post, so they would be easier to see. You can use the full size option when you're posting pics, rather than the thumbnail option.
She evidently thought she found the Holy Grail and that would be apparent to everybody here with eyeballs. How many times have we seen that, lol?
That's like asking how do you tell if it's a piece of cut glass or a diamond? Just trust us. Or, if you can't, look it up. This sums it up, some: https://www.coingrading.com/isitproof1.html. It's a handsome coin, though, don't get that aspect wrong. It's the kind you'd keep, if you were into collecting coins.
I clicked yes that the coin is real, your coin has beveled rims. Proof Lincolns have square rims. As said yours is a business strike.
Not bad for a find from your drawer at work. Should fill the hole in your collection nicely, assuming you have a Wheat Cent collection.
Which is why it's important to state what someone thinks they have. I do everything almost exclusively on a desktop for the large monitor and a real keyboard. Her images are tiny and 90% background, so I had to save them off and blow them up just to see what the date is. It's immediately obvious that it's not the 1909-S VDB, so is that what she thinks it "could be", or is it something else? Does she think there's an error, or a DDO, or RPD, or what? I hate having to work so hard. I'm not trying to give the OP a hard time; just trying to encourage people to be more descriptive with their posts. It's a nice coin that I would put in a 2x2 or album and keep.
I get you but if you look at her post it’s like she’s got dollar signs in her eyes or something. She just thought it’s clear as day she hit the lottery or a 99-1 horse at the racetrack so didn’t think of having to point it out. “Whirlwind” I think they call it. She was in one of those things.
I have a 2009 penny from the series that my coin app says is mint state...I have the entire set just not this condition. ..
You used thumbnail option again. Just for practice, try posting the images again and look for the option to insert images in full image size. You should see it there after you upload them. It defaults to thumbnail size. You have to select the option to post full-sized images. It’s right there once you’ve uploaded- you’ll see it. Most folks prefer to see full-sized pictures rather than having to click on a thumbnail. I could fix it for you again, but then you wouldn’t get the practice. It’s pretty easy once you look for it
It saves us a click. In really long threads however requesting tons of pictures full-image loads erratically and slow and is irritating, at least to me. I think in those thumbnails is the way to go. In a lot of those I don't even see at the coins for the lousy loads.