Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Aslpride, post: 1677815, member: 36954&quot;]cpm9ball: I did screen them in twice. First screening based on light and no magnify. Any noticeable hairlines, marks, and finger prints are rejected to BU rolls. All of that noticeable can be seen without magnify. Second screen was used with 10X magnify to ensure no marks on highest point. That&#039;s how I screened them. Mistake placed coin shouldn&#039;t happen because I did check them for third time under lamp for last check up to ensure that I didn&#039;t miss anything. The problem is IKE should not contained MS 64 for 1974, 1977 and 1978. 1976 IKE is only one may contained MS64, but I got few MS63 and all of them had hairlines on high point areas. I do know hairlines will knock off one or two points from overall grade. That&#039;s why I was wondering if shipping was at fault due to how it was packed?</p><p><br /></p><p>Idhair: I agreed as I stated that &quot;they are professional&quot;. That&#039;s why I want to know if shipping is the cause of hairlines on high point areas?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in