Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="Jaelus, post: 2750824, member: 46237"]Actually I've done that as well. PCGS was differentiating between multiple versions of restrikes of the same coin, and NGC was not. By sending them example photos of how PCGS was doing it, I got them to adopt that practice as well. In the cases I've got though, I can't really compare between PCGS and NGC. One coin is a pattern that's incorrectly listed as a business strike. Another is a business strike that's incorrectly listed as a pattern. Four are entirely missing from Krause. One is incorrectly omitted from revolutionary coinage (wasn't a problem when they were using the KM number, but now all are listed on the label as revolutionary coinage except for one). A few others are not incorrect, but Krause just has made up names for the types that have nothing to do with established type descriptions from their country. In the cases where I've been successful in getting NGC to change their policy, it's where the coins in question were, in fact, listed in one of the catalogs of record that they use.[/QUOTE]