Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Copper cents (pre-1982) worth more than Face Value?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="benveniste, post: 1054262, member: 25547"]At least where I buy gas, it's prices at $X.XX.9 cents a gallon, so I'm getting a rounded off price 9/10th of the time as it is.</p><p> </p><p>The point behind bringing up that little bit of silliness is that rounding is always matter of granularity. The finer the granularity, the more precise the price, but that precision comes with administrative overhead. So any choice of minimum currency unit is going to be a compromise based on the perceived value of that precision.</p><p> </p><p>One of the first coinage choices the U.S. made was not to mint a farthing and limit granularities to 1/2 cent. Then the elimination of the half-cent upped the ante to 1 cent. Great Britain followed a different philosophy and kept farthings around for almost 100 years after the U.S. eliminated the half cent.</p><p> </p><p>Silently, inflation has made a 1-cent granularity finer and finer. While making buying power comparisons over long periods of time is suspect, I believe that a nickel has less buying power today than a half cent did in 1857. So my personal opinion is that cost of keeping around the cent isn't worth the benefit it provides, and after the next spate of inflation the nickel won't be worth keeping around either.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="benveniste, post: 1054262, member: 25547"]At least where I buy gas, it's prices at $X.XX.9 cents a gallon, so I'm getting a rounded off price 9/10th of the time as it is. The point behind bringing up that little bit of silliness is that rounding is always matter of granularity. The finer the granularity, the more precise the price, but that precision comes with administrative overhead. So any choice of minimum currency unit is going to be a compromise based on the perceived value of that precision. One of the first coinage choices the U.S. made was not to mint a farthing and limit granularities to 1/2 cent. Then the elimination of the half-cent upped the ante to 1 cent. Great Britain followed a different philosophy and kept farthings around for almost 100 years after the U.S. eliminated the half cent. Silently, inflation has made a 1-cent granularity finer and finer. While making buying power comparisons over long periods of time is suspect, I believe that a nickel has less buying power today than a half cent did in 1857. So my personal opinion is that cost of keeping around the cent isn't worth the benefit it provides, and after the next spate of inflation the nickel won't be worth keeping around either.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Copper cents (pre-1982) worth more than Face Value?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...