Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;desertgem, post: 1522060, member: 15199&quot;]From the photo it looks like damage to a &quot;5&quot; to that resembles a &quot;3&quot;.&nbsp; This final number differed very slightly in the length of the tail , and the angle between the top bar and the rounded curve on the bottom right of your number seems to have the spacing of a &quot;5&quot; rather than a &quot;3&quot;. </p><p><br /></p><p>Clad metal was not approved or used until after July , 1965, when the mint produced both silver 64 dimes to fulfil orders, and the current year 1965 clad dimes. It is much easier to imagine a sliver planchet being struck 1965 or a 1964 being clad ( there are a few of each) than a 1963 struck on clad, as the material was not in use when 1963 dies were being used.</p><p><br /></p><p>Jim[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in