Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2577813, member: 28107&quot;]There is no requirement that the coin actually be uttered in order for it to be counterfeit as that term is used legally.&nbsp; The distinction you make doesn&#039;t make sense to me, and it contradicts the case law I have cited in other threads (albeit for different purposes).&nbsp; All of the listed examples are counterfeit coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>The word &quot;contemporary&quot; means happening or existing at the same time, so you cannot logically divorce the temporal aspect.&nbsp; A piece produced while the series was actively in production would absolutely qualify.&nbsp;&nbsp; As for a strict cut-off, I don&#039;t think there is one.&nbsp; I would argue that it would qualify as long as the piece it is emulating regularly circulated <i>regardless</i>&nbsp; of whether the counterfeiter intended to fool collectors or introduce the counterfeit into commerce.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in