Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Contemporary Counterfeits
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Ian, post: 186479, member: 283"]This fake is the right weight, but what you can't tell from the image is that it is slightly oversized. If it were the right size it would be the typical 2 grams or so underweight. So weight on its own isn't always a fool proof indicator. You need to take actual size into consideration too.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now, this `fake' is also silver....just not quite the .917 that it should be. I wouldn't expect most of you to tell that just from the image either, but I know that some of you could.</p><p><br /></p><p>THE main giveaway (IMHO) requires that you know a little bit about Mexico 8 reales and my first question would be `who or what does the HJ initials in the reverse legend refer to? They don't appear on colonial Mexican coinage until 1809.....yet this coin has them dated 1792'. While there is always a possibility that an obverse 1792 somehow managed to muled with a reverse 1809 it should be enough of a discrepancy to ring alarm bells big time.</p><p><br /></p><p>There are a couple of very dubious design characteristics one of which includes the look on Charlies face...etc <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Ian</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>A good example of why you should buy the book before you buy the coin.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Ian, post: 186479, member: 283"]This fake is the right weight, but what you can't tell from the image is that it is slightly oversized. If it were the right size it would be the typical 2 grams or so underweight. So weight on its own isn't always a fool proof indicator. You need to take actual size into consideration too. Now, this `fake' is also silver....just not quite the .917 that it should be. I wouldn't expect most of you to tell that just from the image either, but I know that some of you could. THE main giveaway (IMHO) requires that you know a little bit about Mexico 8 reales and my first question would be `who or what does the HJ initials in the reverse legend refer to? They don't appear on colonial Mexican coinage until 1809.....yet this coin has them dated 1792'. While there is always a possibility that an obverse 1792 somehow managed to muled with a reverse 1809 it should be enough of a discrepancy to ring alarm bells big time. There are a couple of very dubious design characteristics one of which includes the look on Charlies face...etc ;) Ian A good example of why you should buy the book before you buy the coin.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Contemporary Counterfeits
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...