Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Constantius II
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="lehmansterms, post: 4279749, member: 80804"]That's a regular-size follis - being a posthumous commemorative it is a somewhat unusual type for the era, granted. But it's not out of the ordinary as to its denomination (it's not a fraction) or size. If the date of issue is correct (~312) it was issued as much as a couple of years after Maximian's demise in ~310. Galerius was still alive in early 311. </p><p>As I understand it (and without dragging out RIC to check all the legend citations), both Maximian and Galerius used the GAL VAL titlature in their coin legends at various times; both were associated with Hercules vs. Diocletian and Constantius being associated with Zeus. So, although there is a possibility this was issued for Maximian a couple of years after the old tetrarch's death, it seems more likely to have been in honor of the more recently deceased Galerius - we at least know and are familiar with his use of the GAL VAL name contraction.</p><p>I suppose there might be a distant possibility it was issued in honor of both at the same time? Not a typical Roman move, but not inconceivable.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="lehmansterms, post: 4279749, member: 80804"]That's a regular-size follis - being a posthumous commemorative it is a somewhat unusual type for the era, granted. But it's not out of the ordinary as to its denomination (it's not a fraction) or size. If the date of issue is correct (~312) it was issued as much as a couple of years after Maximian's demise in ~310. Galerius was still alive in early 311. As I understand it (and without dragging out RIC to check all the legend citations), both Maximian and Galerius used the GAL VAL titlature in their coin legends at various times; both were associated with Hercules vs. Diocletian and Constantius being associated with Zeus. So, although there is a possibility this was issued for Maximian a couple of years after the old tetrarch's death, it seems more likely to have been in honor of the more recently deceased Galerius - we at least know and are familiar with his use of the GAL VAL name contraction. I suppose there might be a distant possibility it was issued in honor of both at the same time? Not a typical Roman move, but not inconceivable.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Constantius II
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...