Constantius II

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by randygeki, Feb 13, 2012.

Page 2 of 2
  1. randygeki

    randygeki Coin Collector

    aw man lol after all the other mistakes no one will bielve me but that really was a type XD. Thanks Doug
     
    randygeki, Feb 17, 2012
    #21 + Quote Reply
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    I'm having a little trouble understanding how such a common coin got omitted from RIC in the first place but discovered later and given the A number which, in this case fills in the gap rather than indicating a sub type. Perhaps mistakes jinx 187A?
     
    dougsmit, Feb 17, 2012
    #22 + Quote Reply
Page 2 of 2
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page