Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Constantius II siliqua
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="SIliquae, post: 4591863, member: 76032"]</p><p>In fact, the mintmark is with a dot: <b>SIRM•</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p>And the date is not "357-361 AD" but 351-355 (heavy siliqua, so before the change of 358).</p><p><b>Date</b>: 350-355</p><p><br /></p><p>Then the #ref is<b> RIC 19, RSC 342-3g (R1)</b>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="SIliquae, post: 4591863, member: 76032"][B][/B] In fact, the mintmark is with a dot: [B]SIRM• [/B] And the date is not "357-361 AD" but 351-355 (heavy siliqua, so before the change of 358). [B]Date[/B]: 350-355 Then the #ref is[B] RIC 19, RSC 342-3g (R1)[/B][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Constantius II siliqua
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...