Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Constantine R5
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="gsimonel, post: 2677187, member: 82549"]I agree with your observations. The two Victories reverse type seems by far the most common imitation of a Constantine bronze, just as the fallen horseman type is the most common of his sons. Although I have no proof of this, I suspect that there is an important difference between the two imitations, however. The two Victories imitations are for the most part similar in size and texture to the official issues, suggesting that they are probably contemporaneous with the official coins, most of which were minted, more or less, between 318-320. In theory, they could have traded along side official issues at and beyond the frontiers. Many of the fallen horseman imitations that I've seen, however, are much smaller than the official ones, similar in size to 5th-century and Vandalic-era bronzes. I can't see how these could have been confused with or accepted as equivalent to the official bronzes of the mid 4th century. My guess is that they appeared much later. So why was this reverse imitated rather than a 5th-century type, such as a cross reverse of Theodosius II, which more closely matches the imitations in size?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="gsimonel, post: 2677187, member: 82549"]I agree with your observations. The two Victories reverse type seems by far the most common imitation of a Constantine bronze, just as the fallen horseman type is the most common of his sons. Although I have no proof of this, I suspect that there is an important difference between the two imitations, however. The two Victories imitations are for the most part similar in size and texture to the official issues, suggesting that they are probably contemporaneous with the official coins, most of which were minted, more or less, between 318-320. In theory, they could have traded along side official issues at and beyond the frontiers. Many of the fallen horseman imitations that I've seen, however, are much smaller than the official ones, similar in size to 5th-century and Vandalic-era bronzes. I can't see how these could have been confused with or accepted as equivalent to the official bronzes of the mid 4th century. My guess is that they appeared much later. So why was this reverse imitated rather than a 5th-century type, such as a cross reverse of Theodosius II, which more closely matches the imitations in size?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Constantine R5
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...