Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;bobbyhelmet, post: 1640751, member: 44166&quot;]Trier seems on the whole to have produced the most substantial and &#039;well made&#039; coins and also had the most &#039;efficient&#039; mintmark and fieldmark system (typical Germans!).</p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH]236175.vB[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p> <p style="text-align: center">A large (5.3g) Trier coin next to a smaller (3.1g) Rome &#039;<b>T in Wreath</b>&#039; example&#039;.</p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p> <p style="text-align: center">I also have a couple of Half-follis coins from Trier, the only mint to produce them (shown with the above follis):</p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p> <p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH]236180.vB[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p> <p style="text-align: center">The follis is RIC VI 875 and I think the two halves are RIC VI 899?</p><p><br /></p><p>I agree with Martin that th<span style="color: #333333">e </span>Lyon coins are OK and along with the London ones show the most character, the Lyon reverses have attributes not of the other mints show.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in