Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Constantine I aureus - HERCVLI CONS CAES
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Heliodromus, post: 8351342, member: 120820"][ATTACH=full]1481697[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1481698[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1481699[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1481705[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>I first saw this coin for sale a year ago, raw, at Swedish auction house Myntkompaniet. I was hoping it might fly under the radar, but no such luck and I was outbid. However, a few weeks ago it reappeared at Heritage, now slabbed, and I figured I'd try again. I was the only bidder, happy to win it for an opening bid of $2500, about half of what it went for raw at Myntkompaniet! Evidentially holed coins with "1/5 surfaces" isn't what Heritage bidders are looking for, even if slabbed! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Despite being unlisted for Constantine, the HERCVLI CONS CAES type is a standard Antioch tetrarchic gold type for a western (i.e. Herculean) caesar, being paired with IOVI CONS CAES for his eastern (Jovian) counterpart. Other mints also issued similar Jovian/Herculean tetrarchic types, although not this specific legend.</p><p><br /></p><p>These HERCVLI/IOVI CONS CAES types had first been issued for Constantius/Galerius in the 1st tetrarchy, then for Severus II/Maximinus II in 2nd tetrarchy, and finally for Constantine/Maximinus II (both unlisted) in 3rd tetrarchy. The type was issued for Constantine on two occasions, once here as caesar, and later also as filius augustorm.</p><p><br /></p><p>Heritage made no attempt to date the coin, other than the obvious "from Constantine's time as caesar", but it seems we can narrow that down considerably since Constantine was out of favor in the east after aligning with Maximianus, and was only rehabilitated at Carnuntum in 11-308 when he was given the "filius augustorm" title. Bronze coinage for Constantine at Antioch stops with his unlisted appearance in the "ANT:" issue in 306-307 (my specimen below), and then only restarts after Carnuntum.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1481700[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>RIC VI does list two bronze GENIO types for Constantine in the intervening 307-308 period, but both appear erronious. RIC 87b is attested only from a specimen in the British Museum, which is available online and can in fact be seen to really be the later RIC 104 with feint crescent in left field (it perhaps doesn't help that RIC 104 is misdescribed, and really has a CAES vs FIL AVG legend). RIC 94b is attested only from Voetter's Gerrin catalog, and is nowhere to be seen. Many of Voetter's entries are suspect, such as here where RIC notes him also having Licinius in same issue as RIC 94b, which is impossible since Licinius only appears after Carnuntum!</p><p><br /></p><p>So, we can date this HERCVLI CONS CAES aureus, for Constantine as caesar, to sometime between 7-306 when he becomes caesar to sometime before mid 307 when Constantine's alliance with Maximianus had become intolerable due to Maximianus having caused the death of Severus, necessitating Galerius himself to attempt to recover Rome. In all likelyhood it dates to the earlier part of this range (in 306 perhaps, or new year 307) since it was a pro forma type who's issuance was likely triggered by the event of change of tetrarchic lineup (death of Constantius I, elevation of Severus II, begrudging acceptance of Constantine as caesar). The bronze ANT: GENIO type for Constantine, above, presumably dates to same time (and note similar bust for Constantine).</p><p><br /></p><p>This type for Constantine would have been issued alongside the corresponding IOVI CONS CAES type for Maximinus II, which matches the description of RIC VI Antioch 68. However, RIC 68 is co-dated to RIC 67 for Severus, so that is an earlier issue. In fact the population of coins matching the description of RIC 68 can be divided into two parts:</p><p><br /></p><p>1) Coins with a rounded jaw matching the bust type for Severus. This is the real RIC 68.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1481701[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1481702[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Above two coins both ex. NAC.</p><p><br /></p><p>2) Coins with an angular jaw, issued alongside this Constantine type, these RIC 68 specimens should really be given a different attribution and date.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1481703[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1481704[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Above is my coin and a "RIC 68" specimen ex. Kunker 273.932. Another similar specimen for Daia is in the Glasgow Hunterian collection.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here's a visual of the overall sequence.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1481706[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The bottom coin in the above sequence is the same HERCVLI CONS CAES reverse type reissued for Constantine post-Carnuntum in late 308/early 309, now with a FIL AVG title. This type is also missing from RIC, but is recorded as Depeyrot 23-2 noting a specimen sold by Christies in 1986. The Christies' coin was subsequently resold by Stacks & Bowers at NYINC in 2013, which is the photo I used above.</p><p><br /></p><p>A final point to note is the double piercing of my coin, which some might find a distraction, but to me actually adds to the allure of the coin! This type of double (vs single) piercing is highly characteristic of coins that have been used as jewelry in India! This coin has a story to tell, from being minted in Antioch shortly before Constantine's fall from grace, apparent travel to India (likely by sea via Arabian gulf) for use in trade, at some point later appropriated and pierced for use as jewelry (who knows where it dangled!), and eventually lost before being discovered in modern times. Sadly the find spot isn't known.</p><p><br /></p><p>As always, please post anything related, such as coins from this Antioch time period, Constantine as caesar, or other holed coins![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Heliodromus, post: 8351342, member: 120820"][ATTACH=full]1481697[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1481698[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1481699[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1481705[/ATTACH] I first saw this coin for sale a year ago, raw, at Swedish auction house Myntkompaniet. I was hoping it might fly under the radar, but no such luck and I was outbid. However, a few weeks ago it reappeared at Heritage, now slabbed, and I figured I'd try again. I was the only bidder, happy to win it for an opening bid of $2500, about half of what it went for raw at Myntkompaniet! Evidentially holed coins with "1/5 surfaces" isn't what Heritage bidders are looking for, even if slabbed! :) Despite being unlisted for Constantine, the HERCVLI CONS CAES type is a standard Antioch tetrarchic gold type for a western (i.e. Herculean) caesar, being paired with IOVI CONS CAES for his eastern (Jovian) counterpart. Other mints also issued similar Jovian/Herculean tetrarchic types, although not this specific legend. These HERCVLI/IOVI CONS CAES types had first been issued for Constantius/Galerius in the 1st tetrarchy, then for Severus II/Maximinus II in 2nd tetrarchy, and finally for Constantine/Maximinus II (both unlisted) in 3rd tetrarchy. The type was issued for Constantine on two occasions, once here as caesar, and later also as filius augustorm. Heritage made no attempt to date the coin, other than the obvious "from Constantine's time as caesar", but it seems we can narrow that down considerably since Constantine was out of favor in the east after aligning with Maximianus, and was only rehabilitated at Carnuntum in 11-308 when he was given the "filius augustorm" title. Bronze coinage for Constantine at Antioch stops with his unlisted appearance in the "ANT:" issue in 306-307 (my specimen below), and then only restarts after Carnuntum. [ATTACH=full]1481700[/ATTACH] RIC VI does list two bronze GENIO types for Constantine in the intervening 307-308 period, but both appear erronious. RIC 87b is attested only from a specimen in the British Museum, which is available online and can in fact be seen to really be the later RIC 104 with feint crescent in left field (it perhaps doesn't help that RIC 104 is misdescribed, and really has a CAES vs FIL AVG legend). RIC 94b is attested only from Voetter's Gerrin catalog, and is nowhere to be seen. Many of Voetter's entries are suspect, such as here where RIC notes him also having Licinius in same issue as RIC 94b, which is impossible since Licinius only appears after Carnuntum! So, we can date this HERCVLI CONS CAES aureus, for Constantine as caesar, to sometime between 7-306 when he becomes caesar to sometime before mid 307 when Constantine's alliance with Maximianus had become intolerable due to Maximianus having caused the death of Severus, necessitating Galerius himself to attempt to recover Rome. In all likelyhood it dates to the earlier part of this range (in 306 perhaps, or new year 307) since it was a pro forma type who's issuance was likely triggered by the event of change of tetrarchic lineup (death of Constantius I, elevation of Severus II, begrudging acceptance of Constantine as caesar). The bronze ANT: GENIO type for Constantine, above, presumably dates to same time (and note similar bust for Constantine). This type for Constantine would have been issued alongside the corresponding IOVI CONS CAES type for Maximinus II, which matches the description of RIC VI Antioch 68. However, RIC 68 is co-dated to RIC 67 for Severus, so that is an earlier issue. In fact the population of coins matching the description of RIC 68 can be divided into two parts: 1) Coins with a rounded jaw matching the bust type for Severus. This is the real RIC 68. [ATTACH=full]1481701[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1481702[/ATTACH] Above two coins both ex. NAC. 2) Coins with an angular jaw, issued alongside this Constantine type, these RIC 68 specimens should really be given a different attribution and date. [ATTACH=full]1481703[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1481704[/ATTACH] Above is my coin and a "RIC 68" specimen ex. Kunker 273.932. Another similar specimen for Daia is in the Glasgow Hunterian collection. Here's a visual of the overall sequence. [ATTACH=full]1481706[/ATTACH] The bottom coin in the above sequence is the same HERCVLI CONS CAES reverse type reissued for Constantine post-Carnuntum in late 308/early 309, now with a FIL AVG title. This type is also missing from RIC, but is recorded as Depeyrot 23-2 noting a specimen sold by Christies in 1986. The Christies' coin was subsequently resold by Stacks & Bowers at NYINC in 2013, which is the photo I used above. A final point to note is the double piercing of my coin, which some might find a distraction, but to me actually adds to the allure of the coin! This type of double (vs single) piercing is highly characteristic of coins that have been used as jewelry in India! This coin has a story to tell, from being minted in Antioch shortly before Constantine's fall from grace, apparent travel to India (likely by sea via Arabian gulf) for use in trade, at some point later appropriated and pierced for use as jewelry (who knows where it dangled!), and eventually lost before being discovered in modern times. Sadly the find spot isn't known. As always, please post anything related, such as coins from this Antioch time period, Constantine as caesar, or other holed coins![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Constantine I aureus - HERCVLI CONS CAES
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...