From what I can tell... yes, they do look real but, I’m not a coin nor paper money expert... maybe @SteveInTampa can help
Brittle looking, parchment-like paper? One-sided printing? Sorry, they look like tourist replicas to me. Do note that I am not a currency guy, though, so take my admonition with the proverbial grain of salt. I think they're bad, but I could be wrong.
I don't think so. Not the ones I've had, (*as far as I can remember). Maybe there were some types that were uniface, but I don't know. Those one-sided notes on stiff, crinkly parchment, however, are a common item at museum and state park gift shops, I know. Seen plenty of 'em. Though not a currency collector and thus out of my depth a bit, I would say I'm 90% confident these are fake. (*But I will stand corrected if I'm wrong.)
It's been a long time since I had any CSA currency, so I honestly don't remember. Then again, I just did remember that I had this piece until about a year ago, and it is uniface. But it's a Richmond city issue (not CSA) and a fractional denomination (cents, not dollars). Small. So it may be a whole different thing. But it was printed on soft paper with a high cloth content. Not that crinkly yellowish parchment that you see the gift shop repros done on. Note the faded ink and evidence of wear, as well. (*Side note: they sure loved those "letters made out of logs" fonts in the 1860s and 1870s.)
They are copies printed by the Historical Products Company of Philadelphia. The serial number is on the bogus not list on Cutchfield Currency.
Definitely replica currency. This is the Crutch Williams website @lettow mentioned. http://www.crutchwilliams.com/BogusCSA_RoTx.html
Did they have the technology at that time to print the signature? Or, was each piece individually signed?
I'll bet they had the technology, but all the notes I've seen from the period still had handwritten signatures. Note my Richmond city 75c example, above.
One of the cooler CSA note collections that I have seen was where one note was signed and the signature ran off the note and the collector had the matching note that the signature ran over onto. They were a perfect match.
Each note was hand signed by 2 people. The serial numbers were also written. The serial numbers were also written by hand. This best describes what I'm saying. The signature on the top bill for the Treasurer goes well into the bottom bill. The serial number is the same on both bills, which was common but note the numbervon the bottom bill is an error as the last digit is missing. The top bill is plate number 5 and the bottom bill is plate number 6. The back of both bills is totally blank, also normal.
Hey, now i am getting confused, is it a def FAKE or not sure. I have a buyer fir 5 bucks just as collectibles for his grandkids, but if they are real, worth alot more. Is rhere anything on the bills, i could get a better pic on, or is this for sure FAKE. Thanks everyone, for chiming in. Even though i get confused, i love learning from you all. Yes. Paper is VERY yellow and brittle, edges almost appear singed.
@Chopperhead , definitely replicas, reproductions, fake, not authentic and not genuine Confederate issued paper money.