Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Condition and grade
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 3602323, member: 44316"][USER=88829]@lrbguy[/USER] , I will consider your point, and that of [USER=84744]@Severus Alexander[/USER] too. My paragraph at the end of</p><p><a href="http://augustuscoins.com/ed/numis/condition.html#II" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://augustuscoins.com/ed/numis/condition.html#II" rel="nofollow">http://augustuscoins.com/ed/numis/condition.html#II</a></p><p>began with a reference to a spectacular $47,000 coin that might have been $470 in clear, but far from perfect, grade. I want collectors to be able to think the $470 example is special and collectable--nothing to be ashamed of.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>If you got that impression, I need to change the wording. </p><p><br /></p><p>To be not ashamed of coins that don't grade high is not the same as being ashamed of coins that do. I would never suggest being ashamed of great coins, not even the $47,000 sestertius. </p><p><br /></p><p>It is one thing to collect high-grade coins; it is another to discourage those who don't. I intended to say that we should not discourage collectors who have, enjoy, and are willing to share lower-grade coins. I thought I was clear that US coin publications do discourage the collecting of EF or lower-grade coins. Maybe not in so many words, but it is there in every issue. A collector's coins do not deserve distain because they are not EF. If someone doesn't want coins below EF, fine. Anyone can collect what they want. But, I hope that person will do nothing to discourage those who do buy coins below EF.</p><p><br /></p><p>Maybe I need to rethink how to say what I wrote. [Insertions in brackets here are not in the original and won't be in a revision] "It is not good for the hobby if fewer collectors want the myriad medium- and low-grade ancient coins that most can afford. [When you show coins] don't emphasize grade [to rub it in to those who don't have such high-grade coins] and don't subtly imply that [high] grade is the key to a coin's desirability. It's not."</p><p><br /></p><p>I might say "only key" but I thought the term "key" implied "the one" already. </p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=88829]@lrbguy[/USER] , I wonder if the Trajan DAC CAP denarius I showed in VF or lower grade, but pretty nice condition nevertheless, shows enough artwork for your purposes?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 3602323, member: 44316"][USER=88829]@lrbguy[/USER] , I will consider your point, and that of [USER=84744]@Severus Alexander[/USER] too. My paragraph at the end of [URL]http://augustuscoins.com/ed/numis/condition.html#II[/URL] began with a reference to a spectacular $47,000 coin that might have been $470 in clear, but far from perfect, grade. I want collectors to be able to think the $470 example is special and collectable--nothing to be ashamed of. If you got that impression, I need to change the wording. To be not ashamed of coins that don't grade high is not the same as being ashamed of coins that do. I would never suggest being ashamed of great coins, not even the $47,000 sestertius. It is one thing to collect high-grade coins; it is another to discourage those who don't. I intended to say that we should not discourage collectors who have, enjoy, and are willing to share lower-grade coins. I thought I was clear that US coin publications do discourage the collecting of EF or lower-grade coins. Maybe not in so many words, but it is there in every issue. A collector's coins do not deserve distain because they are not EF. If someone doesn't want coins below EF, fine. Anyone can collect what they want. But, I hope that person will do nothing to discourage those who do buy coins below EF. Maybe I need to rethink how to say what I wrote. [Insertions in brackets here are not in the original and won't be in a revision] "It is not good for the hobby if fewer collectors want the myriad medium- and low-grade ancient coins that most can afford. [When you show coins] don't emphasize grade [to rub it in to those who don't have such high-grade coins] and don't subtly imply that [high] grade is the key to a coin's desirability. It's not." I might say "only key" but I thought the term "key" implied "the one" already. [USER=88829]@lrbguy[/USER] , I wonder if the Trajan DAC CAP denarius I showed in VF or lower grade, but pretty nice condition nevertheless, shows enough artwork for your purposes?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Condition and grade
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...