Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Cherd, post: 8645356, member: 24754&quot;]I&#039;m wondering if &quot;Poemenius&quot; should be added to the list. Apparently, he started a revolt in Trier while Constantius II was going after Magnentius in 353. His revolt was in support of Constantius II, and he even got around to minting some coins in Trier, which mimicked coins that were being minted of Magnentius (Chi Ro on reverse). Here is an example that I found online:</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/collectors-society-production/Collectibles/111056/2366846_DetailsThumb_Obv.jpg?t=MTEvMjgvMjAxNSA4OjIzOjQyIFBN" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /><img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/collectors-society-production/Collectibles/111056/2366846_DetailsThumb_Rev.jpg?t=MTEvMjgvMjAxNSA4OjIzOjQyIFBN" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>When NGC slabs these coins, the labels look like this:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1517736[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Does the (?) mean that the bust likeness might be Poemenius? Or does &quot;for Constantius II&quot; mean that the bust is that of the emperor? I&#039;ve checked the NGC website and searched for information like this, but didn&#039;t find anything.</p><p><br /></p><p>There is some information to be found online about the coin in general, but indications about who the bust represents are inconsistent. I&#039;m leaning toward Constantius II, but wanted to see if any of you might know something more definitive.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in