Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;wrucmike, post: 325800, member: 5452&quot;]Playing devil&#039;s advocate, the only thing that I can think of as an argument is the following:</p><p><br /></p><p>The plaintiffs (SEGS, PCI, etc.) grade crappy, but don&#039;t allow counterfeits in their slabs.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>eBay/ANA/PNG is aware of this and still is pushing a policy that states &quot;everything slabbed by companies other than PCGS/NGC/ICG/ANACS is counterfeit,&quot;&nbsp; knowing that this statement is inaccurate.</p><p><br /></p><p>Therefore, eBay&#039;s policy that states that the plaintiff&#039;s coins are counterfeit is libelous - they may be highly inferrior to PCGS/NGC graded coins, but they ain&#039;t fakes.</p><p><br /></p><p>MAYBE that has some legitimacy to it.&nbsp; I don&#039;t know if there&#039;s a stat that the defendants can point to and say &quot;20% of the junk slabbed by the plaintiffs is fake, vs. 0% (or .000000001%) of PCGS/NGC/ICG/ANACS.&quot;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in