Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;kanga, post: 366571, member: 9270&quot;]Yeh, cameras (and to a lesser extent scanners) pick up all sort of nasty stuff the eye doesn&#039;t see.</p><p>Cameras generally have a better resolving power than the eye.</p><p>Plus the eye/brain combination tends to filter out minor distractions.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I find imaging at a high resolution, then reducing to screen size results in an image that comes close to what the eye sees.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Here&#039;s one I did:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><img src="http://home.comcast.net/~dcderoo/5-1938DS-MS60.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>For me this image only takes up about two-thirds of the screen width.</p><p>But I run may screen size at 1152 x 864 pixels.</p><p>I try to size the image so that it would fill the screen for someone running at 800 x 600 pixels.</p><p>Many people still operate at the resolution.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in