Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Colosseum Sestertius - Opinions?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1901014, member: 19463"]I would feel better about the matter if I had confidence in the truth of this supposition but I see the fact as that coin collecting is a matter of fashion and taste. Today we see some willing to pay premium prices for garishly toned silver dollar that, 50 years ago, would have been avoided or 'dipped' by most people. In the Renaissance it was considered quite appropriate to produce and collect replica medals to fill in for rare Roman originals. We call them 'Paduans' now. It is not at all impossible that 'artistically enhanced' coins will become more in demand that those with faults and missing details. </p><p><br /></p><p>Oil paintings found with rips and blisters are routinely repaired and repainted in part to produce something to be displayed as an intact whole. Statues receive missing parts or even get cobbled together from assorted junk parts whether or not the parts were from the same original or even the same period. It is considered quite appropriate to glue together pottery shards and make a great looking pot with well concealed seams and modern patches (sometimes painted to match; sometimes not). For most of us, tooled coins are offensive because they look 'tooled'. This really means that they were poorly done by amateur toolers. When these people perfect their skills, will people prefer their restorations to the item before they touched it. I say almost certainly. Specialists with years of experience in the field will be able to tell the difference but billionaires did not become billionaires by studying coin repair. It is already hard to find some coins in untouched state (Colosseum is one here as is Judaea Capta). I do not see this improving as long as there are people with $100,000 to spend on a coin who do not care or, worse, prefer the enhanced version. </p><p><br /></p><p>I am not a sculpture expert. I own not a single statue or nose broken from one. My local art museum recently removed from display a full length statue of Caligula 'for study'. When I first saw it, I considered it obvious that the body was newer than the head. Now when you go to the museum, they offer a pamphlet explaining where the seams are. </p><p><a href="http://virginiamuseum.blogspot.com/2013/02/caligula-loses-his-head.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://virginiamuseum.blogspot.com/2013/02/caligula-loses-his-head.html" rel="nofollow">http://virginiamuseum.blogspot.com/2013/02/caligula-loses-his-head.html</a></p><p><img src="http://www.pbase.com/dougsmit/image/48413636.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><a href="http://www.blackbird.vcu.edu/v12n2/gallery/schertz_p/caligula.shtml" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.blackbird.vcu.edu/v12n2/gallery/schertz_p/caligula.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackbird.vcu.edu/v12n2/gallery/schertz_p/caligula.shtml</a></p><p>Are coins of the $100,000 class following in the path previously trod by million dollar statues? When they determine that part of all of Caligula's body is a thousand years newer than his head, how will it effect the value of the statue. Full length statues of Caligula are really rare. This used to be one. Is it still? Is Pluto a planet?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1901014, member: 19463"]I would feel better about the matter if I had confidence in the truth of this supposition but I see the fact as that coin collecting is a matter of fashion and taste. Today we see some willing to pay premium prices for garishly toned silver dollar that, 50 years ago, would have been avoided or 'dipped' by most people. In the Renaissance it was considered quite appropriate to produce and collect replica medals to fill in for rare Roman originals. We call them 'Paduans' now. It is not at all impossible that 'artistically enhanced' coins will become more in demand that those with faults and missing details. Oil paintings found with rips and blisters are routinely repaired and repainted in part to produce something to be displayed as an intact whole. Statues receive missing parts or even get cobbled together from assorted junk parts whether or not the parts were from the same original or even the same period. It is considered quite appropriate to glue together pottery shards and make a great looking pot with well concealed seams and modern patches (sometimes painted to match; sometimes not). For most of us, tooled coins are offensive because they look 'tooled'. This really means that they were poorly done by amateur toolers. When these people perfect their skills, will people prefer their restorations to the item before they touched it. I say almost certainly. Specialists with years of experience in the field will be able to tell the difference but billionaires did not become billionaires by studying coin repair. It is already hard to find some coins in untouched state (Colosseum is one here as is Judaea Capta). I do not see this improving as long as there are people with $100,000 to spend on a coin who do not care or, worse, prefer the enhanced version. I am not a sculpture expert. I own not a single statue or nose broken from one. My local art museum recently removed from display a full length statue of Caligula 'for study'. When I first saw it, I considered it obvious that the body was newer than the head. Now when you go to the museum, they offer a pamphlet explaining where the seams are. [url]http://virginiamuseum.blogspot.com/2013/02/caligula-loses-his-head.html[/url] [IMG]http://www.pbase.com/dougsmit/image/48413636.jpg[/IMG] [url]http://www.blackbird.vcu.edu/v12n2/gallery/schertz_p/caligula.shtml[/url] Are coins of the $100,000 class following in the path previously trod by million dollar statues? When they determine that part of all of Caligula's body is a thousand years newer than his head, how will it effect the value of the statue. Full length statues of Caligula are really rare. This used to be one. Is it still? Is Pluto a planet?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Colosseum Sestertius - Opinions?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...