Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mrbrklyn, post: 460926, member: 4381&quot;]Years, but there were dies that never had that detail.&nbsp; No?&nbsp; Later years many of the dies missed a lot of detail.</p><p><br /></p><p>My only two points is:</p><p><br /></p><p>A) You can&#039;t use a designation for something that doesn&#039;t exist</p><p><br /></p><p>B) The 1916 designation has a mushy and non-mushy FH&#039;s which to me is completely inconsistent.&nbsp; Mushy means loss of the detail of the head.&nbsp; Only the ones with full detail, bad dies or not, should be full heads by the 1916 standard...forget the 1917 standard.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Ruben[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in