Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 459949, member: 15309&quot;]PCGS states that in order for the 1916 to get the FH designation, all intended detail must be present.&nbsp; The design change was to the head itself.&nbsp; The 1916 only had a cap and some strands of hair underneath the cap behind the neck.&nbsp; The 1917 replaced the strands with cords of hair that are present under the entire length of the cap.&nbsp; I have provided a photo that compares the two designs so that you can decide for yourself whether the design change is significant enough to warrant a different standard for the designation.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Standing%20Liberty%20Quarters/1916vs1917FH.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>FWIW, I don&#039;t think I will ever have enough money to purchase a 1916 SLQ so the designation is almost meaningless to me, hence the omission in my post about it in my other thread.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in