Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;bahabully, post: 888976, member: 17555&quot;]I consider hits or abrasions as wear.. just me, maybe just my mis-use of terminology. The coin you show does have wear imo, and is MS. I guess it boils down to what is wear and what is not... if you exclude abrasions and contact marks,, what&#039;s left, &quot;the accumulation of abrasions and contact marks until &#039;wear&#039; is evident&quot; ?&nbsp;&nbsp; I think a bit of tpg grading variability in play at the highest level here....&nbsp; is a very interesting converstation piece RLM.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I don&#039;t consider this coin to have an average strike,,, I&#039;d consider the strike very sub par..... at that was for a MS64 coin per defintion,, what does pcgs say about MS65 strike requirement ?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in