Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
CoinTalk's BEST COIN GRADERS (from pics)-7
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="bahabully, post: 878451, member: 17555"]Round 7 recap:</p><p> </p><p>Again, good strong participation and competition !</p><p> </p><p>I think we around the halfway point after round 7.</p><p> </p><p>Why 2nd tier's ? I have around 2 more rounds worth of them queued up (~8 more within the ~28 total remaining),, I've looked at them, and there are no over the top zingers in the group as there were in the cent round. There are a couple that could have been graded a grade lower, and a couple that could have been graded a grade higher.... but I probably offer the same guidance for the big 3 group also. Anyway, they represent a minority of the graded population and should not affect the rankings significantly,,, If I find any that the group deviates from too far, then we can put it to a vote to remove after they are scored.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> :loud::loud::loud::loud::loud:</p><p>:high5: WE HAVE OUR FIRST EXACTA :high5:</p><p> :loud::loud::loud::loud::loud:</p><p> </p><p>** Some 20 rounds into the grading exercises and WHAM **</p><p>Not so easy, but viola >>> CONGRATULATIONS....</p><p>..... MARK_H :high5: </p><p> </p><p>SEGS grades:</p><p>1899 - MS63 > nice date. A bit dinged obv, outstanding rev. Lots of luster. I was thinking it may have gone 62-63 in a big 3 holder. The group did very well grading this 2nd tier coin. I'd be curious to know what ya'll think it would go as in a big three holder ?</p><p>NGC grades:</p><p>1957 - MS66 > Toners are tough,, what is a contact mark vs. what is a natural break in the toning skin... etc. Really a pretty red, white/gray, and blue coin in hand.</p><p>1937 - MS66 > No FB here, close I think, but nope. Toning on this one is very attractive in hand, could not get the colors (blues/reds) in the pics.</p><p>1945S - MS65 (micro S) > congrats: Raider / RLM's & Duke for calling out the micro S. Hard coin to grade imo, it's a bit darker in hand, not too attractive, not too ugly, just a nice grade and neat variety.</p><p> </p><p>Observations: All other observations pale in comparision to :loud: CONGRATULATIONS MARK_H !!</p><p> </p><p>Awards for this set of cents:</p><p>Best - Mark_h - 0.0000 > really helps the ranking score. </p><p>HA - Chip - 2.25 > the 57 toner hurt <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p>Others:</p><p>Jello - 1.50 </p><p>Raider - .25 </p><p>Bigjpst - .50</p><p>Swigh - 1.00</p><p>Lehigh - .25</p><p>Leadfoot - .75</p><p>BQcoins - 1.00</p><p>Ldhair - .50</p><p>Badthad - .75</p><p>RLM's - .50</p><p>Duke - .25 </p><p> </p><p>On to round 8.............[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="bahabully, post: 878451, member: 17555"]Round 7 recap: Again, good strong participation and competition ! I think we around the halfway point after round 7. Why 2nd tier's ? I have around 2 more rounds worth of them queued up (~8 more within the ~28 total remaining),, I've looked at them, and there are no over the top zingers in the group as there were in the cent round. There are a couple that could have been graded a grade lower, and a couple that could have been graded a grade higher.... but I probably offer the same guidance for the big 3 group also. Anyway, they represent a minority of the graded population and should not affect the rankings significantly,,, If I find any that the group deviates from too far, then we can put it to a vote to remove after they are scored. :loud::loud::loud::loud::loud: :high5: WE HAVE OUR FIRST EXACTA :high5: :loud::loud::loud::loud::loud: ** Some 20 rounds into the grading exercises and WHAM ** Not so easy, but viola >>> CONGRATULATIONS.... ..... MARK_H :high5: SEGS grades: 1899 - MS63 > nice date. A bit dinged obv, outstanding rev. Lots of luster. I was thinking it may have gone 62-63 in a big 3 holder. The group did very well grading this 2nd tier coin. I'd be curious to know what ya'll think it would go as in a big three holder ? NGC grades: 1957 - MS66 > Toners are tough,, what is a contact mark vs. what is a natural break in the toning skin... etc. Really a pretty red, white/gray, and blue coin in hand. 1937 - MS66 > No FB here, close I think, but nope. Toning on this one is very attractive in hand, could not get the colors (blues/reds) in the pics. 1945S - MS65 (micro S) > congrats: Raider / RLM's & Duke for calling out the micro S. Hard coin to grade imo, it's a bit darker in hand, not too attractive, not too ugly, just a nice grade and neat variety. Observations: All other observations pale in comparision to :loud: CONGRATULATIONS MARK_H !! Awards for this set of cents: Best - Mark_h - 0.0000 > really helps the ranking score. HA - Chip - 2.25 > the 57 toner hurt ;) Others: Jello - 1.50 Raider - .25 Bigjpst - .50 Swigh - 1.00 Lehigh - .25 Leadfoot - .75 BQcoins - 1.00 Ldhair - .50 Badthad - .75 RLM's - .50 Duke - .25 On to round 8.............[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
CoinTalk's BEST COIN GRADERS (from pics)-7
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...