Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
CoinTalk's BEST CENT GRADERS (from pics)-6
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="bahabully, post: 846817, member: 17555"]Round 6 recap:</p><p><br /></p><p>PCGS grades - </p><p>28D - MS64 RB</p><p>38D - MS65 RB</p><p>16S - MS62 BN</p><p>00 - MS67 RD</p><p>05 - MS67 RD</p><p>29 - MS64 RB</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Opinions:</p><p>Theme was color, again. As observed in the last thread, you can see how diffused light really makes a RB coin appear RD. The area's to note are those somewhat grayish red or dirty red area's,, those are more brown in hand than in the pics.</p><p>Those who offered color did pretty well: Mikenoodle and RLM's tied for best,, Duke hit all of them, but only offered up 4 of 6 colors. </p><p><br /></p><p>28D- Could get a RD designation in a new holder or more if submitted during a more lax pgcs grading cycle. They appear to have been tough back in the day. This is an old holder. Nice coin, you can see weakness in the RD on the cheek, ear, and left of head. Also some RD weakness on rev to the left of "C". I probably would have said 65.</p><p>38D - Beautiful toning in hand. I probably would have gone 65 or 66.</p><p>16S - Toning close to that of the ol' blue 13.. same look, less pronounced. But very very eye appealing and colorful when rolled under light in hand. Minimal wear, but tough to tell,,, it's in that AU-MS range as noted in the thread and hard to grade. I'd have gone 60 and split the middle. I congratulate those who took a stand in solid AU or solid MS range.</p><p>00 - Ugly, water spotty, good detail... must have been a birth year purchase I picked up a decade ago.. blech. But a good comparative sample to place by the 05 for an illustration of tpg variability,,, it's either variability, or they don't grade by ugly waterspots... who knows ?</p><p>05 - Pretty Satin finish.. what a 67 should look like imo.</p><p>29 - Another RB to illustrate how RD a RB coin can look under diffused light. Note the dirty look within the fields,, nice coin, and Rd'ish in hand, but Redder under this light. You have to look for these weak RD area's on coins under diffused light or you risk over grading the color.</p><p><br /></p><p>Awards for this set of cents:</p><p>Best - A couple tied this round - 1.00 (BadThad & MPCUSA)</p><p>HA - Coinman - 6.17 - Welcome Coinman. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Now on to round 7.</p><p>We'll do four cents in round 7, and jump over to NGC for a couple rounds.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="bahabully, post: 846817, member: 17555"]Round 6 recap: PCGS grades - 28D - MS64 RB 38D - MS65 RB 16S - MS62 BN 00 - MS67 RD 05 - MS67 RD 29 - MS64 RB Opinions: Theme was color, again. As observed in the last thread, you can see how diffused light really makes a RB coin appear RD. The area's to note are those somewhat grayish red or dirty red area's,, those are more brown in hand than in the pics. Those who offered color did pretty well: Mikenoodle and RLM's tied for best,, Duke hit all of them, but only offered up 4 of 6 colors. 28D- Could get a RD designation in a new holder or more if submitted during a more lax pgcs grading cycle. They appear to have been tough back in the day. This is an old holder. Nice coin, you can see weakness in the RD on the cheek, ear, and left of head. Also some RD weakness on rev to the left of "C". I probably would have said 65. 38D - Beautiful toning in hand. I probably would have gone 65 or 66. 16S - Toning close to that of the ol' blue 13.. same look, less pronounced. But very very eye appealing and colorful when rolled under light in hand. Minimal wear, but tough to tell,,, it's in that AU-MS range as noted in the thread and hard to grade. I'd have gone 60 and split the middle. I congratulate those who took a stand in solid AU or solid MS range. 00 - Ugly, water spotty, good detail... must have been a birth year purchase I picked up a decade ago.. blech. But a good comparative sample to place by the 05 for an illustration of tpg variability,,, it's either variability, or they don't grade by ugly waterspots... who knows ? 05 - Pretty Satin finish.. what a 67 should look like imo. 29 - Another RB to illustrate how RD a RB coin can look under diffused light. Note the dirty look within the fields,, nice coin, and Rd'ish in hand, but Redder under this light. You have to look for these weak RD area's on coins under diffused light or you risk over grading the color. Awards for this set of cents: Best - A couple tied this round - 1.00 (BadThad & MPCUSA) HA - Coinman - 6.17 - Welcome Coinman. ;) Now on to round 7. We'll do four cents in round 7, and jump over to NGC for a couple rounds.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
CoinTalk's BEST CENT GRADERS (from pics)-6
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...