Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;benhur767, post: 3207368, member: 36818&quot;]Maybe <i>I&#039;m</i> wrong. Looking in RSC it does describe this type as Caracalla and Plautilla. A similar CONCORDIA type of Geta says &quot;Geta and Concordia&quot; (but Concordia is veiled) or &quot;Geta and Caracalla.&quot; In parenthesis it says that Cohen thought it was Caracalla and Plautilla on the coin of Geta, which doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense to me. </p><p><br /></p><p>So it seems there&#039;s some confusion about who is who. I do think that the left-hand figure on your coin looks more like Geta than Plautilla, but now I&#039;m not so sure. On the OP&#039;s coin you can see the obvious female hairstyle. But the toga on the left-hand figure on your coin is draped in a similar manner as on female figures. If the figure on your coin had an obvious female hairstyle it would be easier to say for certain that it&#039;s Plautilla. But I guess since the references say &quot;Caracalla and Plautilla,&quot; they&#039;re probably correct.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in