Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SeptimusT, post: 4352225, member: 91240&quot;][USER=77226]@Orange Julius[/USER]&#039; coin is tough, and 575 is plausible. I can&#039;t really make heads or tails of the upper left punch, but it looks like the &#039;flag&#039; symbol doesn&#039;t always have the taurines, or they&#039;re not always clear. One of the examples in the book (page 235) looks very much like the depiction on this coin (compare the bottom left symbol). In fact, it almost looks to me like the entire symbol is enclosed within a partial &#039;bubble,&#039; not just the upper portion. EDIT: Ditto on <a href="https://www.vcoins.com/en/stores/coinindia/36/product/india_maurya_series_vib_silver_punchmarked_karshapana_gh_575_choice/424026/default.aspx" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.vcoins.com/en/stores/coinindia/36/product/india_maurya_series_vib_silver_punchmarked_karshapana_gh_575_choice/424026/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">this example from VCoins</a>, look at the upper right symbol.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1101375[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>To [USER=102653]@TuckHard[/USER], 426 et al. are part of series IVd, which GH attributes to the pre-Maurya Nanda dynasty of Magadha. That&#039;s circa 370 - 321 BC according to the most accepted chronology.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in