Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Coins and their stories
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Voulgaroktonou, post: 3103540, member: 84047"]Every coin tells a story, first, about its users, then much later, perhaps, about its subsequent custodial collectors; if we could only hear it! I recently acquired a coin about which I know one of its stories, one which brings together both me and its previous custodian, a life long friend, who, in the early 1960s taught me to love beautiful Greek and Roman coins, although I was to later veer from his wise precepts and come to love Byzantine coinage best. (As an aside, Yes, I DO find Byzantine coins beautiful. Although most of my friends ((including my best friend, who is also my wife)), tease me for my questionable taste, I find support for it in what Sappho has to say about beauty in her fragment 16. Regarding beauty, she writes, “some say it is an army of horseman, others, of foot soldiers, or a fleet of ships that is the fairest thing on the black earth, but I say it is what one loves”.) But my story is not about what I find beautiful, it is about a connection between a coin and a dear friend, and it is to CWB that I offer these lines.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>In April I purchased from Gemini XIV, lot 584, a Trajan Decius sestertius struck on an oversize flan. The catalog entry notes CWB's comments about the coin: “This coin was offered to me in NYC sometime in the late '60s. Couldn't afford it, but weighed it and made the attached paper rubbing.” What induced me to bid on it WAS that pencil rubbing and its connection with the coin. My friend was later to purchase it from Classical Cash in Sept. 1997, and therein lies the connection that brings me into the story. With the coin, besides the pencil rubbing came also the original Classical Cash invoice from when my friend purchased it. Evidently CWB was not known to the firm at that time as he was obliged to supply a numismatic reference, which is noted on the invoice as “ Bidder, BB, friend of M...B...”, MB being I! Wow! The cycle is now run full circle, until it reopens to subsequent generations of custodians!</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>First, the coin and its pencil rubbing.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]785901[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>This leads to another interesting link, this time to a Volusian sestertius struck on a medallic flan. In the next photo my new Decius is center in the lower row, above which is a typical Decius sestertius, as well as a double sestertius of TD and a medallic flan sestertius of Volusian to illustrate the large size of my recent coin. The upper Decius is ex Gemini XIII, lot 321 (12.27 g. 28.4 mm. hr. 1. RIC 126d). In the lower row, from left, is a Decius double sestertius (37.03 g. 35.5 mm, hr. 12. RIC 126a). It also is from the CWB collection, purchased privately. My recent Gemini purchase was struck on a slightly larger but lighter flan than the double sestertius to its left (25.09 g., 36.6 mm, hr. 1. RIC 126d).</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The second link I mention concerns my Volusian (lower row on the right), struck on a medallic flan (27.33 gr. 38.9 mm. hr. 12. as RIC 253a). We can distinguish it from a true medallion because it includes the letters S(enatus) C(onsulto), “struck by authority of the Senate”. A medallion would lack those letters. Its reverse type of Juno Martialis makes its first and brief appearance on the coinage of Hostilian, Trebonianus Gallus, and Volusian, then disappears completely from the Roman imperial series. I also know of a Trebonianus Gallus medallic flan sestertius bearing this reverse type (Dix Noonan Webb sale 15 Feb. 2017, lot 187). Concerning this scarce type RIC IV, iii, p. 156 says “All that can be said for certain is that the type must be closely related to the events of 251 and, probably, to the family history of Gallus”. Whatever the circumstances, the fact that the rare type occurs not only on silver of the reign, but also on medallions, and as we can see, on sestertii of medallic like flans leads to the conclusion that it commemorates some important event. I mentioned that my new oversize Decius was earlier purchased from Classical Cash and this is where the second link comes in. By coincidence, I bought the Volusian in 2000 on ebay, also from Classical Cash. It's interesting to conjecture that the same firm had several mid century sestertii struck on such exceptional flans. But perhaps that is another story…?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]785903[/ATTACH]</p><p>[ATTACH=full]785904[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Voulgaroktonou, post: 3103540, member: 84047"]Every coin tells a story, first, about its users, then much later, perhaps, about its subsequent custodial collectors; if we could only hear it! I recently acquired a coin about which I know one of its stories, one which brings together both me and its previous custodian, a life long friend, who, in the early 1960s taught me to love beautiful Greek and Roman coins, although I was to later veer from his wise precepts and come to love Byzantine coinage best. (As an aside, Yes, I DO find Byzantine coins beautiful. Although most of my friends ((including my best friend, who is also my wife)), tease me for my questionable taste, I find support for it in what Sappho has to say about beauty in her fragment 16. Regarding beauty, she writes, “some say it is an army of horseman, others, of foot soldiers, or a fleet of ships that is the fairest thing on the black earth, but I say it is what one loves”.) But my story is not about what I find beautiful, it is about a connection between a coin and a dear friend, and it is to CWB that I offer these lines. In April I purchased from Gemini XIV, lot 584, a Trajan Decius sestertius struck on an oversize flan. The catalog entry notes CWB's comments about the coin: “This coin was offered to me in NYC sometime in the late '60s. Couldn't afford it, but weighed it and made the attached paper rubbing.” What induced me to bid on it WAS that pencil rubbing and its connection with the coin. My friend was later to purchase it from Classical Cash in Sept. 1997, and therein lies the connection that brings me into the story. With the coin, besides the pencil rubbing came also the original Classical Cash invoice from when my friend purchased it. Evidently CWB was not known to the firm at that time as he was obliged to supply a numismatic reference, which is noted on the invoice as “ Bidder, BB, friend of M...B...”, MB being I! Wow! The cycle is now run full circle, until it reopens to subsequent generations of custodians! First, the coin and its pencil rubbing. [ATTACH=full]785901[/ATTACH] This leads to another interesting link, this time to a Volusian sestertius struck on a medallic flan. In the next photo my new Decius is center in the lower row, above which is a typical Decius sestertius, as well as a double sestertius of TD and a medallic flan sestertius of Volusian to illustrate the large size of my recent coin. The upper Decius is ex Gemini XIII, lot 321 (12.27 g. 28.4 mm. hr. 1. RIC 126d). In the lower row, from left, is a Decius double sestertius (37.03 g. 35.5 mm, hr. 12. RIC 126a). It also is from the CWB collection, purchased privately. My recent Gemini purchase was struck on a slightly larger but lighter flan than the double sestertius to its left (25.09 g., 36.6 mm, hr. 1. RIC 126d). The second link I mention concerns my Volusian (lower row on the right), struck on a medallic flan (27.33 gr. 38.9 mm. hr. 12. as RIC 253a). We can distinguish it from a true medallion because it includes the letters S(enatus) C(onsulto), “struck by authority of the Senate”. A medallion would lack those letters. Its reverse type of Juno Martialis makes its first and brief appearance on the coinage of Hostilian, Trebonianus Gallus, and Volusian, then disappears completely from the Roman imperial series. I also know of a Trebonianus Gallus medallic flan sestertius bearing this reverse type (Dix Noonan Webb sale 15 Feb. 2017, lot 187). Concerning this scarce type RIC IV, iii, p. 156 says “All that can be said for certain is that the type must be closely related to the events of 251 and, probably, to the family history of Gallus”. Whatever the circumstances, the fact that the rare type occurs not only on silver of the reign, but also on medallions, and as we can see, on sestertii of medallic like flans leads to the conclusion that it commemorates some important event. I mentioned that my new oversize Decius was earlier purchased from Classical Cash and this is where the second link comes in. By coincidence, I bought the Volusian in 2000 on ebay, also from Classical Cash. It's interesting to conjecture that the same firm had several mid century sestertii struck on such exceptional flans. But perhaps that is another story…? [ATTACH=full]785903[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]785904[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Coins and their stories
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...