Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Coins and their History
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="declanwmagee, post: 527193, member: 17358"]I like the effect on the coins that historical events have - for instance, the UK debased it's silver coinage twice in the 20th century. Once in 1920, from .925 to .500 silver, and finally in 1947, from .500 to Cupro-nickel. Both times to pay for a war.</p><p> </p><p>Then there's the little historical snippets that might get lost if it hadn't been for the coins: there was a tradition to put shiny new pennies in kid's Christmas stockings in the 1940s, but during the post-WW2 austerity programme over here the Royal Mint considered that to be a frivolous use of scarce national resources so it artificially darkened them to discourage the practice.</p><p> </p><p>Then, because of the "official" nature of the coinage, you sometimes find a discrepancy between the "official" story, and what later comes to light - so perhaps the fact that the British Empire lost access to the Malaysian tin mines, and had to change the alloy in its bronze coinage, may have had something to do with it; something they may not have wanted to admit publically in 1944.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="declanwmagee, post: 527193, member: 17358"]I like the effect on the coins that historical events have - for instance, the UK debased it's silver coinage twice in the 20th century. Once in 1920, from .925 to .500 silver, and finally in 1947, from .500 to Cupro-nickel. Both times to pay for a war. Then there's the little historical snippets that might get lost if it hadn't been for the coins: there was a tradition to put shiny new pennies in kid's Christmas stockings in the 1940s, but during the post-WW2 austerity programme over here the Royal Mint considered that to be a frivolous use of scarce national resources so it artificially darkened them to discourage the practice. Then, because of the "official" nature of the coinage, you sometimes find a discrepancy between the "official" story, and what later comes to light - so perhaps the fact that the British Empire lost access to the Malaysian tin mines, and had to change the alloy in its bronze coinage, may have had something to do with it; something they may not have wanted to admit publically in 1944.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Coins and their History
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...