Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;ErolGarip, post: 2821439, member: 88736&quot;]I was expecting math professor and old engineer to come here for some contribution. Yes, today, they both said they finally received coins sent, but, they didn&#039;t have time to read and write here. Maybe, they are viewing here and may say a word or two later. </p><p><br /></p><p>After coin&amp;math, since it is coin&amp;economy now, let me continue, with the same formula I wrote above.</p><p><br /></p><p>n.1 + summation of [k.A+l.E+m.I+p.U...] = T(total) ... Equation (2.1)</p><p><br /></p><p>where k, l, m, etc are quantities of each coins with marks of values A, E, I, etc, where A, E, I, etc are, for ex, &quot;half/sessertius/etc&quot;, &quot;quarter/dupondius/etc&quot;, &quot;dime/as/etc&quot;, etc. </p><p><br /></p><p>So, k,l,m,etc are &quot;variables&quot; and A,E,I,etc are also variables &quot;actually&quot;. The only and only constant is &quot;1&quot; (1cent, 1quadran if it is unit value, etc.) </p><p><br /></p><p>Economy link of money... connected with T(total): is related/equalized to &quot;somethings else&quot;, for example, to assigned or blown value of &quot;apple&quot;, eg, for one pound (lb) or 2kg of apple. Lets blow. Money value of 1pound of apple is 91cents = T(otal). </p><p><br /></p><p>Now, Equation(2.1) becomes an equation of coin&amp;economy as money was related to apple, which is somethings else. Lets rewrite (2.1): </p><p><br /></p><p>n.1 + Summation of [k.A+l.E+m.I+p.U+...] = 91cents = Cost of Apple ... Eqn (2.2)</p><p><br /></p><p>Now, &quot;variables&quot; k,l,m,etc and A,E,I,etc are to be determined. How? By following parameters of economy which are also related to some other &quot;somethings else&quot; such as orange value, bread value, car value, tv value, electricity kwh value, etc etc... We already calculated? and have A, E, I, etc (as half, quarter, dime, etc)? Actually, not. They are just randomly chosen coin values without any calculation that should take economy parameters into account, but, didn&#039;t. </p><p><br /></p><p>Not so easy to calculate those &quot;variables&quot; in [ ]... Still, there is hope... But, when the term &quot;n.1&quot; which includes &quot;constant&quot; of money, i.e. &quot;1&quot; is ignored like it has been done, there is no hope... With this way, economy science is a science of blows... So, the very first thing to do is to study what to do with &quot;1cent&quot; which is &quot;unit value&quot; of money in USA. </p><p><br /></p><p>What happens if we continue like that, like what we have already been doing? </p><p>Nothing happens.. except that mathematics and all other sciences using mathematics DO fail...</p><p>And, what we have already been living in reality is that.. science failure... </p><p>(Then, when science fails, you are free easily to say &quot;we landed on the Moon for mankind&quot;... error... It won&#039;t be easy to delete this error in the memory of mankind... To save mankind, this error should be erased and maybe, it can done by doing somethings about &quot;1cent&quot;... Late here, good evening.)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in