Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;ErolGarip, post: 2820572, member: 88736&quot;]1cent &amp; economy ... without giving up the mathematics, that&#039;s not been done by economists and by almost all. </p><p><br /></p><p>What economists and all who listen to them &quot;want&quot; from 1cent? </p><p>They want its circulation of 1cent... </p><p><br /></p><p>Ok, but, 1cent is constant... as shown above, in previous posts. </p><p><br /></p><p>A constant, mathematically or physically, can NOT circulate... </p><p>Circulation of a constant is against its nature of the constant...</p><p><br /></p><p>(Some may say &quot;take Moon, it is circulating/cycling/turning around Earth&quot;. No, it is not exactly really so. Rotation of Moon around Earth is not a real smooth rotation, it is a rotation by &quot;slipping&quot;, somethings like a race car&#039;s slipping when turning around a corner. That&#039;s why we always see the same/constant face of Moon. Anyway, maybe, this Moon example wasn&#039;t a good example to explain why a constant can not circulate. It is not so easy to explain it especially if you are not a linguist. However, you can still understand, with an insight view, that the constant can not travel/rotate/circulate. Having said these, lets go on)</p><p><br /></p><p>So, now, we have these requirements/conditions: </p><p><br /></p><p>1. Mathematicallly, 1cent DOES exist and physically, 1cent coin DOES have to exist... </p><p>2. 1cent is Constant, therefore, NON-negligible... </p><p>3. 1cent can NOT circulate in the economy as it is constant...</p><p><br /></p><p>Then, what should be done, in practice? (&quot;practice&quot; here can be read as &quot;economy&quot; by those who prefer so.) </p><p><br /></p><p>Ps: I stop here, to give some time for those who may need to think and who may have any objection to anything said above. </p><p>Good evening.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in