Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Coin wear and weight investigation
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="-jeffB, post: 1125075, member: 27832"]Wow, I thought I'd be doing a <i>little</i> better at getting new material posted here... <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie3" alt=":(" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>I wanted to do a quick snapshot addressing the "height of a stack" question. People have observed that you can fit more (say) worn Walking Liberty halves than Kennedy halves into a coin tube. How much "thinner" do coins get as they wear?</p><p><br /></p><p>Here's a comparison between a stack of nice 1963-1964 quarters, a stack of well-worn Washington quarters (mostly from the 40's, a couple of AGs, most G-VG, and a few F), and a stack of well-worn to dateless SLQ's (the kind that make it into junk silver lots). Each stack contains 20 coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]113816.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Heights: 27+ mm, 31 mm, 34mm</p><p><br /></p><p>Weights: 116.35 g, 122.12 g, 125.35 g</p><p><br /></p><p>So, yes, those stacks <i>do</i> get distinctly shorter with wear. For the Washington quarters, a full roll of worn ones would be about "four quarters" shorter than a full roll of AU/BU. That's about 10%. The SLQ's are shorter still.</p><p><br /></p><p>But the <i>weights</i> don't decrease nearly as quickly. That 10% "thinning" of the Washingtons corresponds to a mere 3% loss in weight, and even those slick SLQ's, 20% "shorter", are only down about 7% in weight.</p><p><br /></p><p>This isn't really surprising. Wear takes down the high points of the coin first, and those high points determine the spacing of coins in a stack. (I don't have enough well-struck examples to do a comparison of different uncirculated types, so I still don't know whether full-strike Walkers stack more or less densely than Kennedys.)</p><p><br /></p><p>I should probably do the same comparison for Mercury dimes, which get <i>really</i> slick and lose proportionally more weight with wear. I have a stack of pretty nice uncirculated Mercs now (not slab-worthy or FSB, but unworn), and quite a few BU Rosies, so I can do the between-type comparison there as well.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="-jeffB, post: 1125075, member: 27832"]Wow, I thought I'd be doing a [I]little[/I] better at getting new material posted here... :( I wanted to do a quick snapshot addressing the "height of a stack" question. People have observed that you can fit more (say) worn Walking Liberty halves than Kennedy halves into a coin tube. How much "thinner" do coins get as they wear? Here's a comparison between a stack of nice 1963-1964 quarters, a stack of well-worn Washington quarters (mostly from the 40's, a couple of AGs, most G-VG, and a few F), and a stack of well-worn to dateless SLQ's (the kind that make it into junk silver lots). Each stack contains 20 coins. [ATTACH]113816.vB[/ATTACH] Heights: 27+ mm, 31 mm, 34mm Weights: 116.35 g, 122.12 g, 125.35 g So, yes, those stacks [I]do[/I] get distinctly shorter with wear. For the Washington quarters, a full roll of worn ones would be about "four quarters" shorter than a full roll of AU/BU. That's about 10%. The SLQ's are shorter still. But the [I]weights[/I] don't decrease nearly as quickly. That 10% "thinning" of the Washingtons corresponds to a mere 3% loss in weight, and even those slick SLQ's, 20% "shorter", are only down about 7% in weight. This isn't really surprising. Wear takes down the high points of the coin first, and those high points determine the spacing of coins in a stack. (I don't have enough well-struck examples to do a comparison of different uncirculated types, so I still don't know whether full-strike Walkers stack more or less densely than Kennedys.) I should probably do the same comparison for Mercury dimes, which get [I]really[/I] slick and lose proportionally more weight with wear. I have a stack of pretty nice uncirculated Mercs now (not slab-worthy or FSB, but unworn), and quite a few BU Rosies, so I can do the between-type comparison there as well.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Coin wear and weight investigation
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...