Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;scooterv, post: 1769986, member: 56677&quot;]Question rysherms...</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I&#039;m not a chemist, but what you are saying largely makes sense, at least if I try to look at it with what little I know from an electrical and airframe background.&nbsp; However, IF the container is sealed, it would still have fumes or vapors of some sort still there and trapped as you stated.&nbsp; But, if sealed then there is no more transfer, or at least an extremely small amount.&nbsp; Even without having been done in a clean-room environment wouldn&#039;t that still be an advantage for most storage situations?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Otherwise, the link states it neutralizes by offering a larger surface area for those nasties to react with instead of the protected object.&nbsp; I think even a brief glance would say it will still react with the object as well, even if working as designed, but if there is a limited amount present in the container would it not react with the barrier at all?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I know it&#039;s not a dissimilar metal corrosion thing at all, but in concept it sounds like using a sacrificial anode of sorts?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Oh, I&#039;m not asking you to say it works as advertised, I think you covered that <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; Just trying to understand as it looks like it may act as more than just a barrier, just not in the way it&#039;s being advertised?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in