Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 1537927, member: 36230&quot;]I understand the difficulty of post-acid imaging, but my point was not to worry so much about the date itself since if it were the variety, there should be doubling visible elsewhere on the coin, even in this condition. If you take a look at a few known examples and compare, I am sure you will see what I mean.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>It is the mods call to make, but the fact remains that the word can be highly offensive to some people regardless of when the alteration was done. It could be that Vess did not take kindly to the word, so instead of seeing his remark as jealousy or saying &quot;poo&quot; on the editing suggestion, please try to understand that not everyone will see the supposed humor in such a thing.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for the alteration being common, this is of course relative. Just because you have not seen this before, it does not mean the same goes for everyone else. Individual sensibilities vary widely, and my only point was that it is wise to be aware of this. That said, whatever you choose to do or believe is up to you.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in