Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Coin populations and reslabbing.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Owle, post: 758203, member: 22004"]<b>Re-submissions</b></p><p><br /></p><p>The more likely coins to be re-submitted are ones where there is significant money to be made in doing so--$200 or more if you get an upgrade. I wouldn't do it for just one, shipping, grading fees, return shipping, make an upgrade a lot of trouble for the profit, if you are lucky enough to get it--"old holder, lock up-grade", especially old PCGS holder, but there are conservatively graded NGC coins.</p><p> </p><p>PCGS tends to be conservative when grading coins in the AU category for example, where NGC seems to be likely to grade decent looking AUs "58" if they have minimal wear. </p><p> </p><p>I have had some success getting upgrades, and also made the mistake of dipping some coins, thinking I might get an upgrade by doing so. </p><p> </p><p>The grading services should offer greater incentives to returning labels. 50c is ridiculous when you are talking about rare coins where pops. are critical. They could offer more money for labels of rare coins, free grading for the return of a certain number of labels, etc. </p><p> </p><p>I was talking with NGC today on taking coins out of holders, as I sent in some holdered coins for re-grading, and they were very reticent when I talked about taking coins out of holders. They know every submitter does it sooner or later.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Owle, post: 758203, member: 22004"][b]Re-submissions[/b] The more likely coins to be re-submitted are ones where there is significant money to be made in doing so--$200 or more if you get an upgrade. I wouldn't do it for just one, shipping, grading fees, return shipping, make an upgrade a lot of trouble for the profit, if you are lucky enough to get it--"old holder, lock up-grade", especially old PCGS holder, but there are conservatively graded NGC coins. PCGS tends to be conservative when grading coins in the AU category for example, where NGC seems to be likely to grade decent looking AUs "58" if they have minimal wear. I have had some success getting upgrades, and also made the mistake of dipping some coins, thinking I might get an upgrade by doing so. The grading services should offer greater incentives to returning labels. 50c is ridiculous when you are talking about rare coins where pops. are critical. They could offer more money for labels of rare coins, free grading for the return of a certain number of labels, etc. I was talking with NGC today on taking coins out of holders, as I sent in some holdered coins for re-grading, and they were very reticent when I talked about taking coins out of holders. They know every submitter does it sooner or later.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Coin populations and reslabbing.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...