Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 4572019, member: 15309&quot;]You can see the purple toning but the overall look is that you need more light on the surfaces.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I think the top photo is excellent and shows the actual appearance of the coin.&nbsp; While the bottom photo captures the peripheral toning, it also creates an orangish cast across the untoned surfaces and I&#039;m absolutely sure that isn&#039;t what they look like in hand.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I have given my thoughts about your photos of the coins above.&nbsp; Here is my thoughts about what is going on in the rest of this thread.&nbsp; We have two very senior members who I respect a great deal who are going out of there way to give a new member a hard time.&nbsp; I don&#039;t know if they have a past history with him, or they are just so torqued by his pseudo spamming of his photography business that they seem intent on running him outta here.</p><p><br /></p><p>Well I click on threads on Cointalk everyday, and everyday I am bombarded with new members posting photos of literal pocket change asking if their crap coin is rare or worth money.&nbsp; And everyday, I ignore their inane posts and look for someplace where I can contribute constructively.&nbsp; Enter [USER=112673]@Denis Richard[/USER] who has displayed some of the best numismatic photography skills I have ever seen, and this is who they decide to give a hard time.&nbsp; When a new member displays skills like he has, we should go out of our way to make him feel welcome, not get hung up on the minutia of Cointalk Forum Rules.</p><p><br /></p><p>Rant over![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in