Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mrbrklyn, post: 571838, member: 4381&quot;]Mono isn&#039;t supported by Microsoft?&nbsp; Is that a prerequisite for a working programming language?&nbsp; Or was C# supposed to be exclusive domain of Redman?&nbsp; Your completely incorrect at this point.&nbsp; Mono and Dotgnu were both implemented to work with as C# free software analogues.&nbsp; Mono was adopted by the Gnome Project and they spend far too much time, IMO, assuring it being backward compatible with the monopolistic practices of Microsoft, which is one of the biggest reasons why it is universally disliked by the majority of coders who continue to function with standards based programming implementations.</p><p><br /></p><p>Dotgnu was started by David Sugar to give a .net infrastructure to Object C and other languages for interoperability.</p><p><br /></p><p>See - and there is that key word that makes C# suck so much, interoperability.&nbsp; At its core, MS has worked C# out of both sides of its mouth, professing to handle C# within the framework of a standards based organization like the W3C and then implementing insecure and OS dependencies into the core language and causing everyone else to twist in the wind.&nbsp; And that makes it a lousy choice for any serious work.&nbsp; That is aside from the fact that profiling of C# programming is nearly impossible and that the licensing is obstructive, and the code base functions slow as heck, and the ASP framework is a complete failure, heading for the scrapheap of history soon enough.</p><p><br /></p><p>Ruben[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in