Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Coin forums
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="KBBPLL, post: 26138901, member: 104064"]As a guppy, it was an eye-opening experience for me. I had no idea who Roger was at the time, and when I was banned, the president accused me of being in some sort of conspiracy with Roger. That part was bizarre. It was a big fish who had submitted the 1942 experimental cent, and they made a media splash about this "one-of-a-kind high relief" Lincoln. I presented image evidence that it had the same microscopic features as many circulation 1942 cents and was likely just from a fresh pair of working dies they used to test aluminum (right or wrong, who knows, but still). I also posted evidence that it was the same dies used on a second experimental cent. Roger, the author of the book on all of the 1942 experimental cents, was not consulted before their designation, and maybe got too heated. He was put in purgatory, and then poof, banned with no second chance. Meanwhile, they deleted the entire 16+ page thread on the topic, after putting it in "do not bump to recent posts" mode. Admittedly that angered me, because I'd spent a lot of time researching, and it was all gone. I mentioned this again months later on another thread, and bam.</p><p><br /></p><p>The kicker is that later, that second pattern coin was also designated as high relief. So the coin that started it all wasn't unique anymore, and somebody might have been paying attention to my posts. </p><p><br /></p><p>I just like telling that story I guess. Each forum has its own, uh, characteristics.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="KBBPLL, post: 26138901, member: 104064"]As a guppy, it was an eye-opening experience for me. I had no idea who Roger was at the time, and when I was banned, the president accused me of being in some sort of conspiracy with Roger. That part was bizarre. It was a big fish who had submitted the 1942 experimental cent, and they made a media splash about this "one-of-a-kind high relief" Lincoln. I presented image evidence that it had the same microscopic features as many circulation 1942 cents and was likely just from a fresh pair of working dies they used to test aluminum (right or wrong, who knows, but still). I also posted evidence that it was the same dies used on a second experimental cent. Roger, the author of the book on all of the 1942 experimental cents, was not consulted before their designation, and maybe got too heated. He was put in purgatory, and then poof, banned with no second chance. Meanwhile, they deleted the entire 16+ page thread on the topic, after putting it in "do not bump to recent posts" mode. Admittedly that angered me, because I'd spent a lot of time researching, and it was all gone. I mentioned this again months later on another thread, and bam. The kicker is that later, that second pattern coin was also designated as high relief. So the coin that started it all wasn't unique anymore, and somebody might have been paying attention to my posts. I just like telling that story I guess. Each forum has its own, uh, characteristics.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Coin forums
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...