Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;chrisild, post: 2218314, member: 39&quot;]Update - The &quot;internal&quot; vote of the ministers on the second draft (scheduled for August 26, 2015) has been postponed. Will now be in mid-September; by that time a revised draft will be presented. See here: <a href="http://www.coinsweekly.com/en/page/4?&amp;id=3597" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coinsweekly.com/en/page/4?&amp;id=3597" rel="nofollow">http://www.coinsweekly.com/en/page/4?&amp;id=3597</a>&nbsp; So if you want to sign, or know somebody who may be willing to sign, you now have until 20 October ...</p><p><br /></p><p>By the way, while I agree with Ms Kampmann&#039;s concerns (and those of many others), I still think there is a significant difference between unique works of art, and coins which are usually mass products, made to circulate and be used. Ah well, did not keep me from signing. In this update, however, there is a part that I strongly disagree with.</p><p><br /></p><p>She writes &quot;What consternates me is how many signers do not want to see their names published and choose to remain anonymous. It reflects the great distrust collectors have developed of the government.&quot; That is her conclusion, and may well reflect what she thinks; maybe it is the attitude of other collectors too. Does not apply to me though - I am quite simply reluctant to make my address public in such a context. Has nothing to do with the government but with, hmm, crime prevention.</p><p><br /></p><p>Christian[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in