Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
COIN BUYING EDUCTION 101-6 ( New 9/4)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="desertgem, post: 682786, member: 15199"]<b>Result: Genuine , altered surface -.94</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Ok, this coin was slabbed as Genuine -.94 Altered surfaces. I have yet to find any official description as to exactly what this means. They indicate such things as thumbing, moving metal, whizzing, which I can understand OK, but don't see that under microscopic ~ unless it is in photo 2 or 3 below. Chemical alteration seems also to be a "94" possibility such as sulfide treatment ( darken or tone) or cyanide ( lighten- detone) or perhaps over-dipping. I have never seen a coin myself that had admitted cyanide damage, so I am not sure what that would look like beside "dipped white". My suspicions is over dipping or loss of luster/flow lines due to chemical action if it has to be anything. I am not an apologist, so I can admit, I DON'T see any reason for a .94 myself. If any of you do, please give your observations. I would accept a .91 cleaned, as there is some evidence of an old cleaning, but not harsh enough to warrant a .91. I am not whining, just can't find anything.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is my best details and wear wise. Better than my AU 50 by a long shot, so I would value it close to AU55. With the genuine , Granny would be over estimating, but it sure fooled me in hand. I have marked with green arrows where maybe there was something detected.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1832slab.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>close up of the areas.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1832obva-1.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1832obvb-1.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>On the reverse, these are the only areas of possible alteration I could find.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1832revb.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1832reva-1.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Actually I like the coin, that is why it is staying with me. Trying to be objective, I would have bought it @ about $250-270 as it is.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks for your participation!</p><p><br /></p><p>Jim</p><p><br /></p><p>COMING NEXT A LINCOLN !!!!!! BY REQUEST from one who is tired of halves.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="desertgem, post: 682786, member: 15199"][b]Result: Genuine , altered surface -.94[/b] Ok, this coin was slabbed as Genuine -.94 Altered surfaces. I have yet to find any official description as to exactly what this means. They indicate such things as thumbing, moving metal, whizzing, which I can understand OK, but don't see that under microscopic ~ unless it is in photo 2 or 3 below. Chemical alteration seems also to be a "94" possibility such as sulfide treatment ( darken or tone) or cyanide ( lighten- detone) or perhaps over-dipping. I have never seen a coin myself that had admitted cyanide damage, so I am not sure what that would look like beside "dipped white". My suspicions is over dipping or loss of luster/flow lines due to chemical action if it has to be anything. I am not an apologist, so I can admit, I DON'T see any reason for a .94 myself. If any of you do, please give your observations. I would accept a .91 cleaned, as there is some evidence of an old cleaning, but not harsh enough to warrant a .91. I am not whining, just can't find anything. This is my best details and wear wise. Better than my AU 50 by a long shot, so I would value it close to AU55. With the genuine , Granny would be over estimating, but it sure fooled me in hand. I have marked with green arrows where maybe there was something detected. [IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1832slab.jpg[/IMG] close up of the areas. [IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1832obva-1.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1832obvb-1.jpg[/IMG] On the reverse, these are the only areas of possible alteration I could find. [IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1832revb.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1832reva-1.jpg[/IMG] Actually I like the coin, that is why it is staying with me. Trying to be objective, I would have bought it @ about $250-270 as it is. Thanks for your participation! Jim COMING NEXT A LINCOLN !!!!!! BY REQUEST from one who is tired of halves.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
COIN BUYING EDUCTION 101-6 ( New 9/4)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...