Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Coin buying education 101-1
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="desertgem, post: 646517, member: 15199"]<b>Coin revealed- 1921 peace $, ICG AU-58</b></p><p><br /></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>Here is the coin in holder.</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b><img src="http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921Peace.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b></b>The following photos will try to answer some of the questions. </p><p><br /></p><p>I made the mistake of taking photos through the holder's plastic ( this is one coin that I had no photo previous.) and not polishing away the light scratches on the plastic, I didn't notice them at first. I am not claiming there aren't some hairlines, there are. The lines over the jaw are on the slab.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921field.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a good shot of the field in front of the nose, and you can see some. Since they graded it as AU, I assume that is OK. I do not notice any indication of abrasive cleaning or thumbing on the coin.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921motto.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Here is close up of the back motto area. The scratches that are lighter, some have pixelation, are on the holder, looks like a light starburst over the R, have to focus up and down. You can see from the tarnish, I didn't dip the coin.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921date.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>The doubling effect of the date is Machine, I find this often on the 1921-23 Peace $.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now as to tooling,I am not sure of the areas being noticed, but I assumed the below might be the common ones. I looked carefully over the coin at high power (30X) and noticed no metal movement. What I thought were the trouble areas, were mainly from emphasis of the device by tarnish somewhat outlining the device. See below.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921coronet.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921hairdetail.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921eagle.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I have also another ICG58, and ANACS55, and PCGS55. This is the better looking and less wear than the others. It might not get the same grade in a PCGS, but it to me a reasonable coin. </p><p><br /></p><p>The amount asked is HIGH for the grade. In hand with a loupe, I thought it might have a chance at MS ( this was a while back). Now that I look carefully with an excellent microscope, I would grade it 58 also. The only problem I see for an AU58 coin ( as it has luster, hope that shows in the first photo) is some tarnish. Especially around the devices, but there is also a "greying" of the fields that make them appear a little darker. But some know how to fix that if they want :whistle:</p><p><br /></p><p>I won't mention a price, other than to say that it would have to be close to the AU55 to have been considered as a BIN. I paid $200. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie9" alt=":eek:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>I don't know if this helps many, It helps me as I have to really examine the coin and think what photos I should include on coins I wanted to sell. It points out to me what others see and how I should present the best photo for them to decide if there is a problem.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks to all!!:hail:</p><p><br /></p><p>Jim[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="desertgem, post: 646517, member: 15199"][b]Coin revealed- 1921 peace $, ICG AU-58[/b] [B] Here is the coin in holder. [IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921Peace.jpg[/IMG] [/B]The following photos will try to answer some of the questions. I made the mistake of taking photos through the holder's plastic ( this is one coin that I had no photo previous.) and not polishing away the light scratches on the plastic, I didn't notice them at first. I am not claiming there aren't some hairlines, there are. The lines over the jaw are on the slab. [IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921field.jpg[/IMG] Here is a good shot of the field in front of the nose, and you can see some. Since they graded it as AU, I assume that is OK. I do not notice any indication of abrasive cleaning or thumbing on the coin. [IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921motto.jpg[/IMG] Here is close up of the back motto area. The scratches that are lighter, some have pixelation, are on the holder, looks like a light starburst over the R, have to focus up and down. You can see from the tarnish, I didn't dip the coin. [IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921date.jpg[/IMG] The doubling effect of the date is Machine, I find this often on the 1921-23 Peace $. Now as to tooling,I am not sure of the areas being noticed, but I assumed the below might be the common ones. I looked carefully over the coin at high power (30X) and noticed no metal movement. What I thought were the trouble areas, were mainly from emphasis of the device by tarnish somewhat outlining the device. See below. [IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921coronet.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921hairdetail.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1921eagle.jpg[/IMG] I have also another ICG58, and ANACS55, and PCGS55. This is the better looking and less wear than the others. It might not get the same grade in a PCGS, but it to me a reasonable coin. The amount asked is HIGH for the grade. In hand with a loupe, I thought it might have a chance at MS ( this was a while back). Now that I look carefully with an excellent microscope, I would grade it 58 also. The only problem I see for an AU58 coin ( as it has luster, hope that shows in the first photo) is some tarnish. Especially around the devices, but there is also a "greying" of the fields that make them appear a little darker. But some know how to fix that if they want :whistle: I won't mention a price, other than to say that it would have to be close to the AU55 to have been considered as a BIN. I paid $200. :o I don't know if this helps many, It helps me as I have to really examine the coin and think what photos I should include on coins I wanted to sell. It points out to me what others see and how I should present the best photo for them to decide if there is a problem. Thanks to all!!:hail: Jim[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Coin buying education 101-1
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...