Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Severus Alexander, post: 3843606, member: 84744&quot;]I previously revised my round 1 guess from Valentinian to Curtisimo, and I&#039;ll stick with that.&nbsp; Since my first four guesses are <i>clearly</i> correct, this must belong to Al Kowsky, because that&#039;s what Sherlock Holmes would say.&nbsp; Or something. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie5" alt=":confused:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; Sounds like Al and I&#039;m sure he&#039;d like the coin.&nbsp; (Who wouldn&#039;t?)</p><p><br /></p><p>So my revised guesses are:</p><p>Round 1: Curtisimo</p><p>Round 2: Parthicus</p><p>Round 3: Valentinian</p><p>Round 4: dougsmit</p><p>Round 5: Al Kowsky</p><p><br /></p><p>Here&#039;s my victoriatus, Crawford 44/1.&nbsp; [USER=74282]@red_spork[/USER] tells me this variety is one of the earliest issues, so probably around 211-ish, and probably roughly coinciding with the introduction of the denarius. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1019799[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The lines below the shield on mine are indeterminate between skirt and greaves, so it doesn&#039;t fit nicely into any of the 44/1 groups.&nbsp; Probably nobody cares but I can tell myself it&#039;s scarce. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>What&#039;s the Crawford ID and group for the OP? 70/1 group B?&nbsp; (Here&#039;s Steve Brinkman&#039;s <a href="http://stevebrinkman.ancients.info/anonymous/AnonymousVictoriatii.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://stevebrinkman.ancients.info/anonymous/AnonymousVictoriatii.html" rel="nofollow">page on these</a> if you want to check.)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in