Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
CNG 102 disappointing, especially for consignors
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2423764, member: 19463"]I gather not everyone knows that the name Clio was one of the Greek Muses, in this case Muse of History. I'd call it a very appropriate screen name, gender not withstanding, for a student of serious numismatics not intending to resell the wins just because someone offers him $2 more than he paid. There is a fact here not all want to face. Some of us have many times the disposable cash that others have total net worth. If you felt that certain lots went too cheap, one might ask why you did not bid on them. My answer is that 90% of the coins in the sale were not things I would buy for the start bid and many not for a fraction of that number. There were coins in the sale that did not belong in a catalog sale and coins that perhaps should have been in a Triton. I do not pretend to know what factors are in play on deciding which coins go in which sale. I do know that I really miss the old Numismatic Fine Arts mail Bid sales where little dogs like me could buy coins beneath the notice of big dogs on their mailing list. The game has changed with online catalogs going out to thousands of people who have never touched a paper catalog. I'd love to see a list of the coins that went under estimate. Part of the fun</p><p><br /></p><p>is trying to figure out why this coin went for 5x estimate and that one did not sell. It is probably more fun for spectators than 'victims'.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2423764, member: 19463"]I gather not everyone knows that the name Clio was one of the Greek Muses, in this case Muse of History. I'd call it a very appropriate screen name, gender not withstanding, for a student of serious numismatics not intending to resell the wins just because someone offers him $2 more than he paid. There is a fact here not all want to face. Some of us have many times the disposable cash that others have total net worth. If you felt that certain lots went too cheap, one might ask why you did not bid on them. My answer is that 90% of the coins in the sale were not things I would buy for the start bid and many not for a fraction of that number. There were coins in the sale that did not belong in a catalog sale and coins that perhaps should have been in a Triton. I do not pretend to know what factors are in play on deciding which coins go in which sale. I do know that I really miss the old Numismatic Fine Arts mail Bid sales where little dogs like me could buy coins beneath the notice of big dogs on their mailing list. The game has changed with online catalogs going out to thousands of people who have never touched a paper catalog. I'd love to see a list of the coins that went under estimate. Part of the fun is trying to figure out why this coin went for 5x estimate and that one did not sell. It is probably more fun for spectators than 'victims'.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
CNG 102 disappointing, especially for consignors
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...